Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36948531›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2023

Effect of community health worker home visits on antenatal care and institutional delivery: an analysis of secondary outcomes from a cluster randomised trial in Mali.

Kassoum Kayentao, Rakesh Ghosh, Lamine Guindo, Caroline Whidden, Emily Treleaven, Calvin Chiu, Diego Lassala, Mohamed Bana Traoré, Jessica Beckerman, Djoumé Diakité and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02694055 (Proactive Community Case Management and Child Survival), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02694055 nacompletednot on this map

Proactive Community Case Management and Child Survival: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2020Enrolled135,149ConditionsUnder-five Child Mortality, Access to Health CareArmsProactive Community Case Management, Integrated Community Case Management, Removal of point-of-care user fees, Infrastructure improvements at primary health centre, Training of primary health centre staff
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Kassoum Kayentao *Malaria Research & Training Centre, University of Sciences Techniques and Technologies, Bamako, Mali.ORCID 0000-0001-6877-0093
Rakesh Ghosh *Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Rakesh.Ghosh@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7839-4148
Lamine GuindoRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.
Caroline WhiddenRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.ORCID 0000-0003-0570-4632
Emily TreleavenInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Calvin ChiuSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-6870
Diego LassalaRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.
Mohamed Bana TraoréRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.
Jessica BeckermanRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.
Djoumé DiakitéRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.
Aly TembelyDistrict Sanitaire de Bankass, Mopti, Mali.
Ben Moulaye IdrissMinistère de la Santé et du Dévelopement Social, Bamako, Mali.
Mohamed BerthéMinistère de la Santé et du Dévelopement Social, Bamako, Mali.
Jenny X LiuInstitute for Health and Aging, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ari JohnsonRoute de 501 Lodgements SEMA, MUSO, Bamako, Mali.
Mali-Folkecenter · MLMinistère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique · MLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversité des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako · MLUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThough community health workers (CHWs) have improved access to antenatal care (ANC) and institutional delivery in different settings, it is unclear what package and delivery strategy maximises impact.

methodsThis study reports a secondary aim of the Proactive Community Case Management cluster randomised trial, conducted between December 2016 and April 2020 in Mali. It evaluated whether proactive home visits can improve ANC access at a population level compared with passive site-based care. 137 unique village clusters, covering the entire study area, were stratified by health catchment area and distance to the nearest primary health centre. Within each stratum, clusters were randomly assigned to intervention or control arm. CHWs in intervention clusters proactively visited all homes to provide care. In the control clusters, CHWs provided the same services at their fixed community health post to care-seeking patients. Pregnant women 15-49 years old were enrolled in a series of community-based and facility-based visits. We analysed individual-level annual survey data from baseline and 24-month and 36-month follow-up for the secondary outcomes of ANC and institutional delivery, complemented with CHW monitoring data during the trial period. We compared outcomes between: (1) the intervention and control arms, and (2) the intervention period and baseline.

resultsWith 2576 and 2536 pregnancies from 66 and 65 clusters in the intervention and control arms, respectively, the estimated risk ratios for receiving any ANC was 1.05 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.07), four or more ANC visits was 1.25 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.43) and ANC initiated in the first trimester was 1.11 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.19), relative to the controls; no differences in institutional delivery were found. However, both arms achieved large improvements in institutional delivery, compared with baseline. Monitoring data show that 19% and 2% of registered pregnancies received at least eight ANC contacts in the intervention and control arms, respectively. Six clusters, three from each arm had to be dropped in the last 2 years of the trial.

conclusionsProactive home visits increased ANC and the number of antenatal contacts at the clinic and community levels. ANC and institutional delivery can be increased when provided without fees from professional CHWs in upgraded primary care clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02694055.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHouse CallsHumansMaliMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnant PeopleYoung Adultmaternal healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID36948531
PMCPMC10040070
OpenAlexW4353062124

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read33
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.