Trial reportJournal of neurology2023
Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06467695 (The Effect of MRI-Guided Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive and Affective Symptoms in Persons With Parkinson's Disease and Controls), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of MRI-Guided Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive and Affective Symptoms in Persons With Parkinson's Disease and Controls
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for learning and memory in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and gait training in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Transcranial stimulation combined with four rehabilitation therapies for gait and motor function in Parkinson's disease: a network meta-analysis of 23 RCTs.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances motor and cognitive performances during dual tasks in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of exercise dose on patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of neurology · 2023Pooled it
- No effect of anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation during motor sequence learning in older people.GeroScience · 2026Trial
- Writing the Future: Artificial Intelligence, Handwriting, and Early Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Recent advances of transcranial electrical stimulation in healthy aging and Parkinson's disease: Effects on dual tasking.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2025Review
- A Review of Recent Advances in Cognitive-Motor Dual-Tasking for Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dysfunction of motor cortices in Parkinson's disease.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Writing training has shown clinical benefits in Parkinson's disease (PD), albeit with limited retention and insufficient transfer effects. It is still unknown whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) can boost consolidation in PD and how this interacts with medication. To investigate the effects of training + atDCS versus training + sham stimulation on consolidation of writing skills when ON and OFF medication. Second, to examine the intervention effects on cortical excitability. In this randomized sham-controlled double-blind study, patients underwent writing training (one session) with atDCS (N = 20) or sham (N = 19) over the primary motor cortex. Training was aimed at optimizing amplitude and assessed during online practice, pre- and post-training, after 24-h retention and after continued learning (second session) when ON and OFF medication (interspersed by 2 months). The primary outcome was writing amplitude at retention. Cortical excitability and inhibition were assessed pre- and post-training. Training + atDCS but not training + sham improved writing amplitudes at retention in the ON state (p = 0.017, g = 0.75). Transfer to other writing tasks was enhanced by atDCS in both medication states (g between 0.72 and 0.87). Also, training + atDCS improved continued learning. However, no online effects were found during practice and when writing with a dual task. A post-training increase in cortical inhibition was found in the training + atDCS group (p = 0.039) but not in the sham group, irrespective of medication. We showed that applying atDCS during writing training boosted most but not all consolidation outcomes in PD. We speculate that atDCS together with medication modulates motor learning consolidation via inhibitory processes ( https://osf.io/gk5q8/ , 2018-07-17).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.