Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36958542›Full record

ArticleBone2023

Automated, calibration-free quantification of cortical bone porosity and geometry in postmenopausal osteoporosis from ultrashort echo time MRI and deep learning.

Brandon C Jones, Felix W Wehrli, Nada Kamona, Rajiv S Deshpande, Brian-Tinh Duc Vu, Hee Kwon Song, Hyunyeol Lee, Rasleen Kaur Grewal, Trevor Jackson Chan, Walter R Witschey and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence system for predicting areal bone mineral density from plain X-rays.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  3. Ultrashort echo time MRI detects significantly lower collagen but higher pore water in the tibial cortex of female patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Bone Biomarkers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Brandon C JonesDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33(rd) St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: bcjones@seas.upenn.edu.
Felix W WehrliDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: felix.wehrli@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Nada KamonaDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33(rd) St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: nkamona@seas.upenn.edu.
Rajiv S DeshpandeDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33(rd) St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: rajiv.deshpande@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Brian-Tinh Duc VuDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33(rd) St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: brian-tinh.vu@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Hee Kwon SongDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: heekwon.song@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Hyunyeol LeeDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hyunyeollee@knu.ac.kr.
Rasleen Kaur GrewalDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: rasleen.grewal@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Trevor Jackson ChanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33(rd) St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: trevor.chan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Walter R WitscheyDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: witschey@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Matthew T MacLeanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: Matthew.Maclean@unchealth.unc.edu.
Nicholas J JosselynDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America; Department of Data Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America. Electronic address: njjosselyn@wpi.edu.
Srikant Kamesh IyerDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Mona Al MukaddamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: mona.almukaddam@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Peter J SnyderDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: pjs@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Chamith S RajapakseDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Founders Building, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: chamith@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Bone Water &Mineralization: Nuclear Magnetic ResonanceR01AR050068 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEHRLI, FELIX W · 2003 to 2022
$4.9M
Cardiac MR imaging of hemorrhagic reperfusion injury after myocardial infarctionR01HL137984 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WITSCHEY, WALTER R.T. · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
MRI Assessment of Hip Fracture Risk and Therapy Response in HIV/HCV CoinfectionR01AR076392 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RAJAPAKSE, CHAMITH SUDESH · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Training in Structural, Physiologic and Functional MRIT32EB020087 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JAMES C GEE, Chamith Sudesh Rajapakse · 2016 to 2026
$2.1M
Clinical Assessment of Hip Fracture Biomechanics using MRIR01AR068382 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RAJAPAKSE, CHAMITH SUDESH · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Bone health assessment through magnetic susceptibility mappingF31AR079925 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JONES, BRANDON CLINTON · 2021 to 2024
$112k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137984NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR079925NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050068NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068382NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR076392NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB020087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of cortical bone porosity and geometry by imaging in vivo can provide useful information about bone quality that is independent of bone mineral density (BMD). Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI techniques of measuring cortical bone porosity and geometry have been extensively validated in preclinical studies and have recently been shown to detect impaired bone quality in vivo in patients with osteoporosis. However, these techniques rely on laborious image segmentation, which is clinically impractical. Additionally, UTE MRI porosity techniques typically require long scan times or external calibration samples and elaborate physics processing, which limit their translatability. To this end, the UTE MRI-derived Suppression Ratio has been proposed as a simple-to-calculate, reference-free biomarker of porosity which can be acquired in clinically feasible acquisition times. PURPOSE: To explore whether a deep learning method can automate cortical bone segmentation and the corresponding analysis of cortical bone imaging biomarkers, and to investigate the Suppression Ratio as a fast, simple, and reference-free biomarker of cortical bone porosity.

methodsIn this retrospective study, a deep learning 2D U-Net was trained to segment the tibial cortex from 48 individual image sets comprised of 46 slices each, corresponding to 2208 training slices. Network performance was validated through an external test dataset comprised of 28 scans from 3 groups: (1) 10 healthy, young participants, (2) 9 postmenopausal, non-osteoporotic women, and (3) 9 postmenopausal, osteoporotic women. The accuracy of automated porosity and geometry quantifications were assessed with the coefficient of determination and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, automated MRI biomarkers were compared between groups and to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)- and peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT)-derived BMD. Additionally, the Suppression Ratio was compared to UTE porosity techniques based on calibration samples.

resultsThe deep learning model provided accurate labeling (Dice score 0.93, intersection-over-union 0.88) and similar results to manual segmentation in quantifying cortical porosity (R

conclusionThis study demonstrated feasibility of a simple, automated, and ionizing-radiation-free protocol for quantifying cortical bone porosity and geometry in vivo from UTE MRI and deep learning.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone DensityCortical BoneFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPorosityRetrospective StudiesCortical boneDeep learningMRIOsteoporosisPorositySuppression Ratio

Identifiers

PMID36958542
PMCPMC10121925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.