Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959239›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2023

The roles of sexual selection and sexual conflict in shaping patterns of genome and transcriptome variation.

Nicole M Tosto, Emily R Beasley, Bob B M Wong, Judith E Mank, Sarah P Flanagan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Organization and evolution of sex-biased gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sex-Specific Dominance of Gene Expression in Seed Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole M TostoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9858-7046
Emily R BeasleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-3602
Bob B M WongSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9352-6500
Judith E MankDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-513X
Sarah P FlanaganSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. sarah.flanagan@canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-4213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is one of the most prevalent, and often the most extreme, examples of phenotypic variation within species, and arises primarily from genomic variation that is shared between females and males. Many sexual dimorphisms arise through sex differences in gene expression, and sex-biased expression is one way that a single, shared genome can generate multiple, distinct phenotypes. Although many sexual dimorphisms are expected to result from sexual selection, and many studies have invoked the possible role of sexual selection to explain sex-specific traits, the role of sexual selection in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression remains difficult to differentiate from other forms of sex-specific selection. In this Review, we propose a holistic framework for the study of sex-specific selection and transcriptome evolution. We advocate for a comparative approach, across tissues, developmental stages and species, which incorporates an understanding of the molecular mechanisms, including genomic variation and structure, governing gene expression. Such an approach is expected to yield substantial insights into the evolution of genetic variation and have important applications in a variety of fields, including ecology, evolution and behaviour.

Indexed as

Sexual SelectionTranscriptomeAnimalsFemaleMaleSelection, GeneticSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID36959239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.