Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959754›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2023

Artificial intelligence in diagnostic ultrasonography.

Oğuz Dicle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noninvasive Monitoring of Steatotic Liver Disease in Western Diet-Fed Obese Mice Using Automated Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Oğuz DicleDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5269-4903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to change paradigms in the field of medicine with new applications that are applicable to daily life. The field of ultrasonography, which has been developing since the 1950s and continues to be one of the most powerful tools in the field of diagnosis, is also the subject of AI studies, despite its unique problems. It is predicted that many operations, such as appropriate diagnostic tool selection, use of the most relevant parameters, improvement of low-quality images, automatic lesion detection and diagnosis from the image, and classification of pathologies, will be performed using AI tools in the near future. Especially with the use of convolutional neural networks, successful results can be obtained for lesion detection, segmentation, and classification from images. In this review, relevant developments are summarized based on the literature, and examples of the tools used in the field are presented.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHumansUltrasonographyArtificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningradiologyultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36959754
PMCPMC10679601

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.