Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961622›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review.

Tamara Ius, Giovanni Sabatino, Pier Paolo Panciani, Marco Maria Fontanella, Roberta Rudà, Antonella Castellano, Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo, Francesco Belotti, Riccardo Boccaletti, Giuseppe Catapano and 22 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advancing glioblastoma therapy with surface-modified nanoparticles.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara IusDivision of Neurosurgery, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Giovanni SabatinoInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Pier Paolo PancianiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. pierpaolo.panciani@unibs.it.
Marco Maria FontanellaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10094, Torino, Italy.
Roberta RudàDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10094, Torino, Italy.
Antonella CastellanoDepartment of Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo BarbagalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (G.F. Ingrassia), Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco" University Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco BelottiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Riccardo BoccalettiNeurosurgery Operative Unit, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Giuseppe CatapanoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy.
Gabriele CostantinoDivision of Neurosurgery, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Alessandro Della PuppaNeurosurgical Clinical Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco Di MecoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Filippo GagliardiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Diego GarbossaDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini," Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Antonino Francesco GermanòDivision of Neurosurgery, BIOMORF Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maurizio IacoangeliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Azienda Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
Pietro MortiniDepartment of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro OliviUnit of Neurosurgery, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
Federico PessinaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio PignottiInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Giampietro PinnaUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Antonino RacoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of NESMOS, AOU Sant'Andrea, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Francesco SalaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicines and Movement Sciences, Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Francesco SignorelliDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Neurosurgery Unit, University "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Silvio SarubboDepartment of Neurosurgery, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale Per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Miran SkrapDivision of Neurosurgery, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Giannantonio SpenaNeurosurgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Teresa SommaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carmelo SturialeNeurosurgery Operative Unit, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Filippo Flavio AngileriDivision of Neurosurgery, BIOMORF Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Vincenzo EspositoDepartment of Neurosurgery "Giampaolo Cantore"-IRCSS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Udine · ITUniversity of Verona · ITAzienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITJohns Hopkins University · USMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale Bellaria · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.

methodsA systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.

resultsA total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).

conclusionsA growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaNeurosurgeryAdultAgedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesExtent of resectionGliomaIntraoperative imagingIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringNavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS)Surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID36961622
PMCPMC10167129
OpenAlexW4360808899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.