Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36961997›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023

Effective Molecular Dynamics from Neural Network-Based Structure Prediction Models.

Alexander Jussupow, Ville R I Kaila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AF-CALVADOS: AlphaFold-guided simulations of multi-domain proteins at the proteome level.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Improving Conformational Ensembles of Folded Proteins in Go̅Martini.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A coarse-grained model for disordered and multi-domain proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Predicting protein conformational motions using energetic frustration analysis and AlphaFold2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander JussupowDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ville R I KailaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4464-6324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in neural network-based structure prediction methods, such as AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold, have dramatically improved the quality of computational protein structure prediction. These models also provide statistical confidence scores that can estimate uncertainties in the predicted structures, but it remains unclear to what extent these scores are related to the intrinsic conformational dynamics of proteins. Here, we compare AlphaFold2 prediction scores with explicit large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of 28 one- and two-domain proteins with varying degrees of flexibility. We demonstrate a strong correlation between the statistical prediction scores and the explicit motion derived from extensive atomistic molecular dynamics simulations and further derive an elastic network model based on the statistical scores of AlphFold2 (AF-ENM), which we benchmark in combination with coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. We show that our AF-ENM method reproduces the global protein dynamics with improved accuracy, providing a powerful way to derive effective molecular dynamics using neural network-based structure prediction models.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsMolecular ConformationMotionNeural Networks, ComputerProtein ConformationProteins

Identifiers

PMID36961997
PMCPMC11181330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.