Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36963034›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: A scoping review.

Anna Galle, Allisyn C Moran, Mercedes Bonet, Katriona Graham, Moise Muzigaba, Anayda Portela, Louise Tina Day, Godwin Kwaku Tuabu, Bianca De Sá É Silva, Ann-Beth Moller

Full text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of mode of delivery on postpartum health-related quality of life.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna GalleDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, WHO Collaborating Centre on Primary Care and Family Medicine, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Belgium.
Allisyn C MoranWorld Health Organization Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mercedes BonetWorld Health Organization Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), UNDP/UNFPA/ UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Geneva, Switzerland.
Katriona GrahamDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, WHO Collaborating Centre on Primary Care and Family Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-7688
Moise MuzigabaWorld Health Organization Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anayda PortelaWorld Health Organization Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Geneva, Switzerland.
Louise Tina DayDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Maternal Newborn Health Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Godwin Kwaku TuabuDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, WHO Collaborating Centre on Primary Care and Family Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium.
Bianca De Sá É SilvaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, WHO Collaborating Centre on Primary Care and Family Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0653-5690
Ann-Beth MollerWorld Health Organization Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), UNDP/UNFPA/ UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High quality postnatal care is key for the health and wellbeing of women after childbirth and their newborns. In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) published global recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal care experience in a new WHO PNC guideline. Evidence regarding appropriate measures to monitor implementation of postnatal care (PNC) according to the WHO PNC guideline is lacking. This scoping review aims to document the measures used to assess the quality of postnatal care and their validity. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic bibliographic databases were searched together with a grey literature search. Two reviewers independently screened and appraised identified articles. All data on PNC measures were extracted and mapped to the 2022 WHO PNC recommendations according to three categories: i) maternal care, ii) newborn care, iii) health system and health promotion interventions. We identified 62 studies providing measures aligning with the WHO PNC recommendations. For most PNC recommendations there were measures available and the highest number of recommendations were found for breastfeeding and the assessment of the newborn. No measures were found for recommendations related to sedentary behavior, criteria to be assessed before discharge, retention of staff in rural areas and use of digital communication. Measure validity assessment was described in 24 studies (39%), but methods were not standardized. Our review highlights a gap in existing PNC measures for several recommendations in the WHO PNC guideline. Assessment of the validity of PNC measures was limited. Consensus on how the quality of PNC should be measured is needed, involving a selection of priority measures and the development of new measures as appropriate.

Identifiers

PMID36963034
PMCPMC10021656

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
reference markers read7
identifiers read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.