Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964597›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2023

Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents.

Stuart J Fairclough, Alex V Rowlands, Borja Del Pozo Cruz, Matteo Crotti, Lawrence Foweather, Lee E F Graves, Liezel Hurter, Owen Jones, Mhairi MacDonald, Deborah A McCann and 7 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Stuart J FaircloughMovement Behaviours, Nutrition, Health, & Wellbeing Research Group, and Department of Sport & Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Alex V RowlandsDiabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Borja Del Pozo CruzFaculty of Education, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Matteo CrottiResearch Centre for Sport, Exercise, and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Lawrence FoweatherThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Lee E F GravesThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Liezel HurterThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Owen JonesThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Mhairi MacDonaldMovement Behaviours, Nutrition, Health, & Wellbeing Research Group, and Department of Sport & Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Deborah A McCannThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Caitlin MillerMovement Behaviours, Nutrition, Health, & Wellbeing Research Group, and Department of Sport & Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Robert J NoonanFaculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK.
Michael B OwenDepartment of Applied Health and Social Care and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
James R RuddNorwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Sarah L TaylorThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Richard TylerMovement Behaviours, Nutrition, Health, & Wellbeing Research Group, and Department of Sport & Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Lynne M BoddyThe Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. L.M.Boddy@ljmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7477-4389
Liverpool John Moores University · GBEdge Hill University · GBCoventry University · GBNorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Greater Manchester · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade use of raw acceleration metrics to assess physical activity has increased. Metrics such as Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO), and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) can be used to generate metrics which describe physical activity volume (average acceleration), intensity distribution (intensity gradient), and intensity of the most active periods (MX metrics) of the day. Presently, relatively little comparative data for these metrics exists in youth. To address this need, this study presents age- and sex-specific reference percentile values in England youth and compares physical activity volume and intensity profiles by age and sex.

methodsWrist-worn accelerometer data from 10 studies involving youth aged 5 to 15 y were pooled. Weekday and weekend waking hours were first calculated for youth in school Years (Y) 1&2, Y4&5, Y6&7, and Y8&9 to determine waking hours durations by age-groups and day types. A valid waking hours day was defined as accelerometer wear for ≥ 600 min·d

resultsThe analytical sample included 1250 participants. Physical activity peaked between ages 6.5-10.5 y, depending on metric. For all metrics the highest activity levels occurred in less active participants (3

conclusionsPercentile reference values for average acceleration, intensity gradient, and MX metrics have utility in describing age- and sex-specific values for physical activity volume and intensity in youth. There is a need to generate nationally-representative wrist-acceleration population-referenced norms for these metrics to further facilitate health-related physical activity research and promotion.

Indexed as

AccelerometryWristAdolescentChildEnglandExerciseFemaleHumansMaleReference ValuesAverage accelerationENMOIntensity gradientMADMVPAMX metricsRaw dataYouth

Identifiers

PMID36964597
PMCPMC10039565
OpenAlexW4360801558

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.