ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2023
Development and Validation of a Lifespan Prediction Model in Chinese Adults Aged 65 Years or Older.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrevious studies investigated factors associated with mortality. Nevertheless, evidence is limited regarding the determinants of lifespan. We aimed to develop and validate a lifespan prediction model based on the most important predictors.
designA prospective cohort study. SETTING AND
participantsA total of 23,892 community-living adults aged 65 years or older with confirmed death records between 1998 and 2018 from 23 provinces in China.
methodsInformation including demographic characteristics, lifestyle, functional health, and prevalence of diseases was collected. The risk prediction model was generated using multivariate linear regression, incorporating the most important predictors identified by the Lasso selection method. We used 1000 bootstrap resampling for the internal validation. The model performance was assessed by adjusted R
resultsTwenty-one predictors were included in the final lifespan prediction model. Older adults with longer lifespans were characterized by older age at baseline, female, minority race, living in rural areas, married, with healthier lifestyles and more leisure engagement, better functional status, and absence of diseases. The predicted lifespans were highly consistent with observed lifespans, with an adjusted R CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The lifespan prediction model was validated with good performance, the web-based prediction tool can be easily applied in practical use as it relies on all easily accessible variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.