Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967860›Full record

ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2022

Cellular therapies in no-option critical limb ischemia: present status and future directions.

Tomasz Kwiatkowski, Katarzyna Zbierska-Rubinkiewicz, Jerzy W Krzywoń, Łukasz Szkółka, Wacław Kuczmik, Marcin Majka, Paweł Maga, Łukasz Drelicharz, Piotr Musiałek, Mariusz Trystuła

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy (REGENACIPStem cell research & therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz KwiatkowskiDepartment of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna Zbierska-RubinkiewiczDepratment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Jerzy W KrzywońDepratment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Łukasz SzkółkaDepartment of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Wacław KuczmikDepartment of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Marcin MajkaDepartment of Transplantation, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Paweł MagaDepartment of Angiology, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Łukasz DrelicharzDepartment of Angiology, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr MusiałekDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Mariusz TrystułaDepartment of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLJohn Paul II Hospital · PLMedical University of Silesia · PLUniversity School of Physical Education in Kraków · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical limb ischemia - an advanced stage of lower extremity arterial disease with presence of rest pain and/or ischemic ulcers - remains an important cause of major amputations and disability in developed societies. Novel treatment strategies are urgently needed to prevent (or delay) amputations in particular for patients in whom effective revascularization is no longer feasible for anatomic and/or technical reasons (no-option critical limb ischemia - N-O CLI). Cellular therapies have been gaining the growing attention of researchers and clinicians in the last two decades. Several cell types have been used in pre-clinical and clinical studies, and a number of mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to vascular reparation and regeneration in N-O CLI. Although early trials suggested clinical improvement with use of cell-based therapies in N-O CLI, meta-analyses that included randomized controlled trials have not provided definitive conclusions. Fundamental limitations have involved poorly defined cell lines/populations, limited numbers of study participants and limited follow-up periods, and enrolling patients "too sick to benefit" (such as those in Rutherford class 6). Recent advances include standardized "unlimited" sources of therapeutic cells and better understanding of mechanisms that may contribute to vascular reparation and regeneration. Furthermore, based on recent pre-clinical and clinical studies, cell-free preparations (such as microvesicle-based) are being increasingly developed along with advanced therapy medical products consisting of engineered cells and pro-angiogenic factors.

Indexed as

cell transplantationcritical limb ischemiaregenerative medicinestem cellsstromal cellsWharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID36967860
PMCPMC10031679
OpenAlexW4312830345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.