ArticleHeliyon2023
Comparison between olfactory training and curcumin therapy in improving olfactory dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic strategies for olfactory impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.BMC nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- The effectiveness of curcumin as a safe agent on hearing threshold improvement in patients with chronic kidney disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Odor olfactory dysfunction in chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus and its association with nutritional factors.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Olfactory dysfunction can be seen in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We aimed to investigate the effects of olfactory training and curcumin on olfactory dysfunction in CKD patients and compare their impact with a placebo. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in CKD patients, 2021-2022. We enrolled 60 participants in our study into three groups (curcumin, training, and control). Participants were randomized into trials and control groups and assessed using the Iran-smell identification test (Iran-SIT), a questionnaire of olfactory disorders (QOD), and a self-assessment tool. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We gathered 58 participants (mean age of 56.1 ± 2.5, 56.9% men). All the tests showed that curcumin improved olfactory function after the trial, though it was significant in QOD (17.5 ± 11.8 vs. 13.1 ± 9.7, p = 0.045) and self-assessment results (8.5 ± 3.1 vs. 9.5 ± 4.0, p = 0.047). Moreover, compared to baseline, training patients experienced an increase in their olfactory function in Iran-SIT (15.3 ± 4.9 vs. 18.8 ± 2.7, p = 0.001), QOD (19.0 ± 10.4 vs. 12.2 ± 9.9, p = 0.003), and self-assessment tools (6.8 ± 1.8 vs. 8.2 ± 3.1, p = 0.027). In contrast, the olfactory function was unchanged in control in all the tests (p > 0.05). Also, the improved change of Iran-SIT and QOD scores during the trial was more significant in training compared to the curcumin group (p < 0.002). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that olfactory training, even more than curcumin, can improve olfactory function in CKD patients. This information may help manage olfactory dysfunction in the CKD population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.