Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968339›Full record

ReviewEngineering biology2022

The roadmap of bioeconomy in China.

Xu Zhang, Cuihuan Zhao, Ming-Wei Shao, Yi-Ling Chen, Puyuan Liu, Guo-Qiang Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Engineering biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Developing Standards Landscape for Cell and Gene Therapies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Exploring the Promoter Generation and Prediction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Synthetic biology in plants.Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The worsening divergence of biotechnology: the importance of risk culture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  10. The roadmap of bioeconomy in China.Engineering biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xu ZhangKey Laboratory of Industrial Biocatalysis, Ministry of Education Department of Chemical Engineering Center of Synthetic and Systems Biology Tsinghua-Peking Center of Life Sciences Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Cuihuan ZhaoCenter of Synthetic and Systems Biology School of Life Sciences Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Ming-Wei ShaoCenter of Synthetic and Systems Biology School of Life Sciences Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Yi-Ling ChenCenter of Synthetic and Systems Biology School of Life Sciences Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Puyuan LiuFaculty of Science University of Waterloo Waterloo Ontario Canada.
Guo-Qiang ChenKey Laboratory of Industrial Biocatalysis, Ministry of Education Department of Chemical Engineering Center of Synthetic and Systems Biology Tsinghua-Peking Center of Life Sciences Tsinghua University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-1782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bioeconomy drives the development of life science and biotechnology as a blueprint for the future development of human society, and offers a cross-cutting perspective on the societal transformation towards long-term sustainability and the transition away from the non-renewable economy. Moreover, the sustainable bioeconomy strategies are consistent with the United Nation's (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and are becoming the centre of the achievement for SDG. The Chinese '14th Five-Year Plan for Bioeconomy Development' (2021-2025), including the development goals of China's bioeconomy containing biomedicine, agriculture, bio-manufacturing and bio-security as a strategic priority, is discussed. The plan offers three pathways to improve bioeconomy, including technological innovation, industrialisation and policy supports. Finally, it concludes China's first bioeconomy development plan as a success, suggesting the key role of industrial biotechnology in bioeconomy.

Indexed as

14th Five‐Year Plan for Bioeconomy DevelopmentbioeconomybiotechnologyChinanext‐generation industrial biotechnology

Identifiers

PMID36968339
PMCPMC9995158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.