Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968450›Full record

ReviewACS physical chemistry Au2023

Single-Molecule Optical Biosensing: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.

Swayandipta Dey, Mathias Dolci, Peter Zijlstra

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swayandipta DeyEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Mathias DolciEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Peter ZijlstraEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven 5600 MB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-2265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the sensitivity and specificity of optical sensors has improved tremendously due to improvements in biochemical functionalization protocols and optical detection systems. As a result, single-molecule sensitivity has been reported in a range of biosensing assay formats. In this Perspective, we summarize optical sensors that achieve single-molecule sensitivity in direct label-free assays, sandwich assays, and competitive assays. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of single-molecule assays and summarize future challenges in the field including their optical miniaturization and integration, multimodal sensing capabilities, accessible time scales, and compatibility with real-life matrices such as biological fluids. We conclude by highlighting the possible application areas of optical single-molecule sensors that include not only healthcare but also the monitoring of the environment and industrial processes.

Identifiers

PMID36968450
PMCPMC10037498

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.