Evidence mapPaperPMID 36968517Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Effect of 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline Change on Statin Prescription for People Living with HIV.

Meng Pan, Afiba Manza-A Agovi, Ifedioranma O Anikpo, Esther O Fasanmi, Erika L Thompson, Jaquetta M Reeves, Caitlin T Thompson, Marc E Johnson, Vitaly Golub, Rohit P Ojha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incidence of Statin Initiation Among People With and Without HIV in the United States: A Prospective Observational Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025 · on this map
    Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meng PanCenter for Epidemiology & Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Afiba Manza-A AgoviCenter for Epidemiology & Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Ifedioranma O AnikpoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Esther O FasanmiPharmacy Clinical Services Outpatient, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Erika L ThompsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Jaquetta M ReevesCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Caitlin T ThompsonCenter for Epidemiology & Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Marc E JohnsonHealing Wings Clinic, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Vitaly GolubHealing Wings Clinic, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Rohit P OjhaCenter for Epidemiology & Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines were updated in 2018 to explicitly recommend statin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention among people living with HIV (PLWH), but little is known about the effect of this guideline change. We aimed to assess the effect of the 2018 ACC/AHA guideline change on statin prescription among PLWH. We used data from an institutional HIV registry to identify PLWH aged 40-75 years, engaged in HIV care between June 2016 and May 2021, had a LDL cholesterol between 70 and 189 mg/dl, 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score ≥7.5%, no prior statin prescription, and no history of diabetes or ASCVD. Our outcome of interest was a new statin prescription within 12 months of eligibility. We estimated standardized risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence limits (CL) by comparing prescription probabilities before and after guideline change. Our study population comprised 251 PLWH (171 before, 80 after the guideline change), of whom 57% were aged <55 years, 82% were male, and 45% were non-Hispanic black. The standardized 12-month statin prescription risk was 43% (95% CL: 31%, 60%) after the guideline change and 19% (95% CL: 13%, 26%) before the guideline change (RD = 25%, 95% CL: 9.1%, 40%). Our results suggest that the 2018 ACC/AHA guideline change increased statin prescription among PLWH, but a sizable proportion of eligible PLWH were not prescribed statin. Future studies are needed to identify strategies to enhance implementation of statin prescription guidelines among PLWH.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseClinical practice guidelineEvaluationHIVPreventionStatin

Identifiers

PMID36968517
PMCPMC10034116

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.