Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968615›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2022

Learning Strategies for Contrast-agnostic Segmentation via SynthSeg for Infant MRI data.

Ziyao Shang, Md Asadullah Turja, Eric Feczko, Audrey Houghton, Amanda Rueter, Lucille A Moore, Kathy Snider, Timothy Hendrickson, Paul Reiners, Sally Stoyell and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deep infant brain segmentation from multi-contrast MRI.Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers · 2025
    Article
  4. MultiMorph: On-demand Atlas Construction.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2025
    Article
  5. Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ziyao ShangUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Md Asadullah TurjaUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Eric FeczkoUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Audrey HoughtonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Amanda RueterUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Lucille A MooreUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Kathy SniderUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Timothy HendricksonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Paul ReinersUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Sally StoyellUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Omid KardanUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Monica RosenbergUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Jed T ElisonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Damien A FairUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Martin A StynerUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Cellular and molecular mechanisms governing cortical surface area overgrowth in iPSC-derived neural cells from longitudinally characterized individuals with autismR01HD055741 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph Piven · 2007 to 2026
$52.6M
Preclinical CoreP50HD103573 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GABRIEL S DICHTER · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Preclinical CoreU54HD079124 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, YUN · 2013 to 2019
$8.0M
The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at CHOP/PennU54HD086984 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ROBINSON, MICHAEL BYRNE, SCHULTZ, ROBERT THOMAS · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
UNC/UMN Baby Connectome ProjectU01MH110274 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS, GILMORE, JOHN HORACE · 2016 to 2019
$4.5M
Shape Analysis Toolbox: From medical images to quantitative insights of anatomyR01EB021391 · NIBIB · KITWARE, INC. · PI PANIAGUA, BEATRIZ · 2016 to 2024
$3.5M
Infant Brain and Behavioral Signatures of Later Emerging Risk for PsychopathologyR01MH104324 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021391NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103573NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055741NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD079124NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD086984NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104324NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH110274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal studies of infants' brains are essential for research and clinical detection of neurodevelopmental disorders. However, for infant brain MRI scans, effective deep learning-based segmentation frameworks exist only within small age intervals due to the large image intensity and contrast changes that take place in the early postnatal stages of development. However, using different segmentation frameworks or models at different age intervals within the same longitudinal data set would cause segmentation inconsistencies and age-specific biases. Thus, an age-agnostic segmentation model for infants' brains is needed. In this paper, we present "Infant-SynthSeg", an extension of the contrast-agnostic SynthSeg segmentation framework applicable to MRI data of infants at ages within the first year of life. Our work mainly focuses on extending learning strategies related to synthetic data generation and augmentation, with the aim of creating a method that employs training data capturing features unique to infants' brains during this early-stage development. Comparison across different learning strategy settings, as well as a more-traditional contrast-aware deep learning model (nnU-net) are presented. Our experiments show that our trained Infant-SynthSeg models show consistently high segmentation performance on MRI scans of infant brains throughout the first year of life. Furthermore, as the model is trained on ground truth labels at different ages, even labels that are not present at certain ages (such as cerebellar white matter at 1 month) can be appropriately segmented via Infant-SynthSeg across the whole age range. Finally, while Infant-SynthSeg shows consistent segmentation performance across the first year of life, it is outperformed by age-specific deep learning models trained for a specific narrow age range.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksData augmentationDeep learningInfant brain segmentationNeurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID36968615
PMCPMC10037234
OpenAlexW4361017390

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.