SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2023
Knowledge mapping of autophagy in osteoarthritis from 2004 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bibliometric analysis of diabetic gastroparesis from 1979 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Increased Rab1a accelerates osteoarthritis by inhibiting autophagy via activation of the mTORC1-S6K pathway.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of skeletal muscle ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) research from 1986 to 2022.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Global Research on Osteoarthritis During 1994-2023: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications and Citations.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Autophagy in Osteoarthritis: A Double-Edged Sword in Cartilage Aging and Mechanical Stress Response: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Medical Imaging Research Trends from 2003 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Global research trends and hot spots on autophagy and kidney diseases: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2022.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Comorbidity of COPD and Lung Cancer: Research Status and Future Directions.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autophagy in osteoarthritis (OA) has become an active area of research with substantial value and potential. Nevertheless, few bibliometric studies have systematically analyzed the available research in the field. The main goal of this study was to map the available literature on the role of autophagy in OA and identify global research hotspots and trends. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases were interrogated for studies of autophagy in OA published between 2004 and 2022. Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were used to analyze and visualize the number of publications and associated citations, and reveal global research hotspots and trends in the autophagy in OA field. Results: 732 outputs published by 329 institutions from 55 countries/regions were included in this study. From 2004 to 2022, the number of publications increased. China produced the most publications (n=456), prior to the USA (n=115), South Korea (n=33), and Japan (n=27). Scripps Research Institute (n=26) was the most productive institution. Martin Lotz (n=30) was the highest output author, while Caramés B (n=302) was the highest output author. Conclusions: Research on the role of autophagy in OA is flourishing. Martin Lotz, Beatriz Caramés, and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.