Evidence mapPaperPMID 36969653Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

The medium-term perceived impact of work from home on life and work domains of knowledge workers during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey at the National Research Council of Italy.

Antonella Bodini, Carlo Giacomo Leo, Antonella Rissotto, Pierpaolo Mincarone, Stanislao Fusco, Sergio Garbarino, Roberto Guarino, Saverio Sabina, Egeria Scoditti, Maria Rosaria Tumolo and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Antonella BodiniInstitute for Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies "E. Magenes", National Research Council, Milano, Italy.
Carlo Giacomo LeoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Antonella RissottoTraining and Welfare Unit, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo MincaroneInstitute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Brindisi, Italy.
Stanislao FuscoTraining and Welfare Unit, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Sergio GarbarinoDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Roberto GuarinoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Saverio SabinaInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Egeria ScodittiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Maria Rosaria TumoloDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Giuseppe PonziniInstitute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Brindisi, Italy.
National Research Council · ITInstitute for Research on Population and Social Policies · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Salento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to investigate perceptions and determinants of the overall impact on life and work domains among a community of knowledge workers after 18 months of forced work from home due to the pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study with a retrospective assessment was conducted early in 2022 at the National Research Council of Italy. Five single-item questions explored the perceived impact on life domain while a 7-item scale the impact on the work domain. Bivariate analyses and multivariate regressions were used to evaluate the associations between impacts and some key factors defined by 29 Results: More than 95% of the 748 respondents reported a perceived change in at least one item of the life domain. For each of these items, although a large group of subjects has reported that working from home had no impact (from 27 to 55%), in the rest of the sample the positive evaluation (from 30 to 60%) clearly prevailed over the negative one. Overall, most of the subjects (64%) rated the impact on the work experience positively. Relationship with colleagues and participation in the work context were the items where the greatest number of negative rates was concentrated (27 and 25%, respectively). On the other hand, positive perceptions prevailed over both negative perceptions and lack of impact perceptions on the subjects of organizational flexibility and quality of work. The frequency of work-room sharing, home-work commute time and changes in sedentary lifestyle, have been identified as common explanatory factors of perceived impacts on both domains. Conclusion: Overall, respondents reported positive rather than negative perceived impacts of forced work from home in both their lives and work. The obtained results suggest that policies to promote the physical and mental health of employees, strengthen inclusion and maintain a sense of community are necessary to improve workers' health and prevent the effects of perceived isolation on research activities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansItalyNational Academy of Sciences, U.S.PandemicsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTeleworkingUnited Statesforced work from homeknowledge workerslife domainperceived impactsmart workwork domain

Identifiers

PMID36969653
PMCPMC10036346
OpenAlexW4323859711

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read75
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.