Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36970245›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

End to End Multitask Joint Learning Model for Osteoporosis Classification in CT Images.

Kun Zhang, Pengcheng Lin, Jing Pan, Peixia Xu, Xuechen Qiu, Danny Crookes, Liang Hua, Lin Wang

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: a literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kun ZhangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-8046
Pengcheng LinSchool of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Jing PanDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Peixia XuSchool of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Xuechen QiuCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China.
Danny CrookesSchool of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.
Liang HuaSchool of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7739-3733
Lin WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9677-2090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a significant global health concern that can be difficult to detect early due to a lack of symptoms. At present, the examination of osteoporosis depends mainly on methods containing dual-energyX-ray, quantitative CT, etc., which are high costs in terms of equipment and human time. Therefore, a more efficient and economical method is urgently needed for diagnosing osteoporosis. With the development of deep learning, automatic diagnosis models for various diseases have been proposed. However, the establishment of these models generally requires images with only lesion areas, and annotating the lesion areas is time-consuming. To address this challenge, we propose a joint learning framework for osteoporosis diagnosis that combines localization, segmentation, and classification to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Our method includes a boundary heat map regression branch for thinning segmentation and a gated convolution module for adjusting context features in the classification module. We also integrate segmentation and classification features and propose a feature fusion module to adjust the weight of different levels of vertebrae. We trained our model on a self-built dataset and achieved an overall accuracy rate of 93.3% for the three label categories (normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) in the testing datasets. The area under the curve for the normal category is 0.973; for the osteopenia category, it is 0.965; and for the osteoporosis category, it is 0.985. Our method provides a promising alternative for the diagnosis of osteoporosis at present.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, MetabolicOsteoporosisHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36970245
PMCPMC10036193

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read31
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.