ArticleNeuroradiology2023
Recurrent reversible in-stent-stenosis after flow diverter treatment.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07420179 (Derivo-ISS), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Derivo-ISS: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing In-Stent Stenosis After Treatment With a Coated Versus Uncoated Flow Diverter (Derivo 2 Heal vs Derivo 2) for Intracranial ICA Aneurysms
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-Stent Stenosis After Surface-Modified Versus Uncoated Flow Diversion: a Randomized Trial (Derivo 2 Heal vs Derivo 2).Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Predicting the O'Kelly-Marotta scale score after flow-diverter stent placement using silent MRA.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- An increase in flow-diverter oversizing values as an independent risk factor for developing more severe in-stent stenosis. A retrospective single-center study based on flow diversion of supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Aren't we missing something? Commentary on "Recurrent reversible in-stent-stenosis after flow diverter treatment" by Garner et al.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow diverter stents (FDS) are well established in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms which are difficult to treat with conventional endovascular techniques. However, they carry a relatively high risk of specific complications compared to conventional stents. A minor but frequent finding is the occurrence of reversible in-stent-stenosis (ISS) that tend to resolve spontaneously over time. Here, we report the case of a patient in their 30s who was treated with FDS for bilateral paraophthalmic internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. ISS were found at the respective early follow-up examinations on both sides and had resolved at the 1-year follow-up examinations. Surprisingly ISS reoccurred at both sides in later follow-up examinations and again resolved spontaneously. The recurrence of ISS after resolution is a finding that has not been described previously. Its incidence and further development should be investigated systematically. This might contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the effect of FDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.