ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2023
Improved Quantitative Analysis Method for Magnetic Particle Imaging Based on Deblurring and Region Scalable Fitting.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the effect of reference and sample volume on magnetic particle imaging quantification.Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials · 2025Article
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Particle Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Advances in Vascular Diagnostics using Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) for Blood Circulation Assessment.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMagnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a technique for imaging magnetic particle concentration distribution. It has the advantages of high sensitivity, no signal attenuation with depth, and no ionizing radiation. Although MPI has been widely used in the biomedical field, accurate image analysis has been challenging due to its anisotropic point spread function (PSF). The purpose of this study is to propose an MPI image restoring and segmentation method to facilitate a more precise quantitative evaluation of the magnetic particle imaging in vivo. PROCEDURES: We proposed a DeRSF method that combined deblurring and region scalable fitting (RSF) to determine the imaging tracer distribution. Then a uniform erosion and scaling criterion was established based on simulation experiments to correct the segmentation results, which was further validated on phantom imaging. Finally, we imaged the MPI tracer at gradient concentrations to establish the calibration curve between the MPI signal and iron mass for iron quantification in phantom and in vivo imaging.
resultsThe phantom imaging experiments showed that our method achieved improved segmentation performance. The mean value of the dice coefficients for segmentation was up to 0.86, demonstrating that our method can accurately map and quantify the distribution of the tracer. Moreover, the iron quantification on both phantom and in vivo mouse imaging was realized with the minimal error of 5.50%, by our established calibration curve.
conclusionsOur proposed DeRSF method was successfully used for improved MPI quantitative analysis. More importantly, this method also showed accurate quantitative results on images with different shapes and tracer concentrations in both phantom and in vivo data, which laid the foundation for the biomedical study of MPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36973569What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.