ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Identifying Reasons for Statin Nonuse in Patients With Diabetes Using Deep Learning of Electronic Health Records.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Decision Support and Cardiometabolic Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025 · on this mapTrial
- Extracting and Classifying Drug Discontinuations From Estonian Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Optimizing large language models for detecting symptoms of depression/anxiety in chronic diseases patient communications.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Integrating New Technologies in Lipidology: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Incidental Finding of Coronary and Non-Coronary Artery Calcium: What Do Clinicians Need To Know?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Impact of Statin Nonacceptance on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence tools in supporting healthcare professionals for tailored patient care.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding Reasons for Oral Anticoagulation Nonprescription in Atrial Fibrillation Using Large Language Models.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Achievement of guideline-based lipid goals among very-high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: results in 213,380 individuals from the cvMOBIUS2 registry.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Clinical Lipidology: A Narrative Review.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2024Review
- Association of health information technology-driven multidisciplinary approaches with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement in patients with an acute coronary syndrome.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Machine learning in precision diabetes care and cardiovascular risk prediction.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background Statins are guideline-recommended medications that reduce cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Yet, statin use is concerningly low in this high-risk population. Identifying reasons for statin nonuse, which are typically described in unstructured electronic health record data, can inform targeted system interventions to improve statin use. We aimed to leverage a deep learning approach to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with diabetes. Methods and Results Adults with diabetes and no statin prescriptions were identified from a multiethnic, multisite Northern California electronic health record cohort from 2014 to 2020. We used a benchmark deep learning natural language processing approach (Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) to identify statin nonuse and reasons for statin nonuse from unstructured electronic health record data. Performance was evaluated against expert clinician review from manual annotation of clinical notes and compared with other natural language processing approaches. Of 33 461 patients with diabetes (mean age 59±15 years, 49% women, 36% White patients, 24% Asian patients, and 15% Hispanic patients), 47% (15 580) had no statin prescriptions. From unstructured data, Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers accurately identified statin nonuse (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.99 [0.98-1.0]) and key patient (eg, side effects/contraindications), clinician (eg, guideline-discordant practice), and system reasons (eg, clinical inertia) for statin nonuse (AUC 0.90 [0.86-0.93]) and outperformed other natural language processing approaches. Reasons for nonuse varied by clinical and demographic characteristics, including race and ethnicity. Conclusions A deep learning algorithm identified statin nonuse and actionable reasons for statin nonuse in patients with diabetes. Findings may enable targeted interventions to improve guideline-directed statin use and be scaled to other evidence-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.