Evidence mapPaperPMID 36978678Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

(Bio)printing in Personalized Medicine-Opportunities and Potential Benefits.

Dobromira Shopova, Antoniya Yaneva, Desislava Bakova, Anna Mihaylova, Petya Kasnakova, Maria Hristozova, Yordan Sbirkov, Victoria Sarafian, Mariya Semerdzhieva

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. (3D) Bioprinting-Next Dimension of the Pharmaceutical Sector.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Multiscale embedded printing of engineered human tissue and organ equivalents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Tissue Bioprinting: Promise and Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dobromira ShopovaDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-930X
Antoniya YanevaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biostatistics and eLearning, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Desislava BakovaDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-8854
Anna MihaylovaDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-6074
Petya KasnakovaDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Maria HristozovaDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Yordan SbirkovDepartment of Medical Biology, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Victoria SarafianDepartment of Medical Biology, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-0175
Mariya SemerdzhievaDepartment of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Medical University Plovdiv · BG

Funding

Medical University Plovdiv PMD 01/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global development of technologies now enters areas related to human health, with a transition from conventional to personalized medicine that is based to a significant extent on (bio)printing. The goal of this article is to review some of the published scientific literature and to highlight the importance and potential benefits of using 3D (bio)printing techniques in contemporary personalized medicine and also to offer future perspectives in this research field. The article is prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases were used in the literature search. Six authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. This review focuses on 3D bio(printing) in personalized medicine and provides a classification of 3D bio(printing) benefits in several categories: overcoming the shortage of organs for transplantation, elimination of problems due to the difference between sexes in organ transplantation, reducing the cases of rejection of transplanted organs, enhancing the survival of patients with transplantation, drug research and development, elimination of genetic/congenital defects in tissues and organs, and surgery planning and medical training for young doctors. In particular, we highlight the benefits of each 3D bio(printing) applications included along with the associated scientific reports from recent literature. In addition, we present an overview of some of the challenges that need to be overcome in the applications of 3D bioprinting in personalized medicine. The reviewed articles lead to the conclusion that bioprinting may be adopted as a revolution in the development of personalized, medicine and it has a huge potential in the near future to become a gold standard in future healthcare in the world.

Indexed as

3D (bio)printingopportunitiespersonalized medicinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36978678
PMCPMC10045778
OpenAlexW4321596587

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.