Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979697›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Endostatin and Cancer Therapy: A Novel Potential Alternative to Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibodies.

Gabriel Méndez-Valdés, Francisca Gómez-Hevia, José Lillo-Moya, Tommy González-Fernández, Joaquin Abelli, Antonia Cereceda-Cornejo, Maria Chiara Bragato, Luciano Saso, Ramón Rodrigo

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Matrix Metalloproteinase 14 in Corneal Neovascularization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Mucosal Melanoma: An Overview of Recent Therapies.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel Méndez-ValdésMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1115-4094
Francisca Gómez-HeviaMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
José Lillo-MoyaMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-9024
Tommy González-FernándezMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Joaquin AbelliMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Antonia Cereceda-CornejoMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.
Maria Chiara BragatoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6659-4409
Luciano SasoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer", Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4530-8706
Ramón RodrigoMolecular and Clinical Pharmacology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1724-571X
University of Chile · CLHumanitas University · IT

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo 1211850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a physiological process that consists of the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting ones. Angiogenesis helps in growth, development, and wound healing through the formation of granulation tissue. However, this physiological process has also been linked to tumor growth and metastasis formation. Indeed, angiogenesis has to be considered as a fundamental step to the evolution of benign tumors into malignant neoplasms. The main mediator of angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is overexpressed in certain cancers. Thus, there are anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, used as anti-cancer therapies. However, bevacizumab has shown adverse events, such as hypertension and proteinuria, which in the most severe cases can lead to cessation of therapy, thus contributing to worsening patients' prognosis. On the other hand, endostatin is an endogenous protein that strongly inhibits VEGF expression and angiogenesis and shows a better safety profile. Moreover, endostatin has already given promising results on small scale clinical studies. Hence, in this review, we present data supporting the use of endostatin as a replacement for anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies.

Indexed as

angiogenesisanti-cancer peptidesendostatin

Identifiers

PMID36979697
PMCPMC10045088
OpenAlexW4322628406

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read73
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.