Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36979723›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Biomechanical Behaviors and Degradation Properties of Multilayered Polymer Scaffolds: The Phase Space Method for Bile Duct Design and Bioengineering.

Ilya Klabukov, Timur Tenchurin, Alexey Shepelev, Denis Baranovskii, Vissarion Mamagulashvili, Tatiana Dyuzheva, Olga Krasilnikova, Maksim Balyasin, Alexey Lyundup, Mikhail Krasheninnikov and 11 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Anatomical Tissue Engineering of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Entheses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ilya KlabukovDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-7999
Timur TenchurinNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey ShepelevNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Denis BaranovskiiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-9959
Vissarion MamagulashviliNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana DyuzhevaDepartment of Hospital Surgery, Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Olga KrasilnikovaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.
Maksim BalyasinResearch and Educational Resource Center for Cellular Technologies, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-344X
Alexey LyundupResearch and Educational Resource Center for Cellular Technologies, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail KrasheninnikovResearch and Educational Resource Center for Cellular Technologies, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3574-4013
Yana SulinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7702-2687
Vitaly GomzyakNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey KrasheninnikovNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander BuzinNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-2646
Georgiy ZayratyantsDepartment of Pathology, Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Delegatskaya st., 20, p. 1, 127473 Moscow, Russia.
Anna YakimovaDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-6533
Anna DemchenkoN.P. Bochkov Research Centre for Medical Genetics, 115478 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey IvanovDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.
Peter ShegayDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.
Andrey KaprinDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249031 Obninsk, Russia.
Sergei ChvalunNational Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", 1, Akademika Kurchatova pl., 123182 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9405-4509
Kurchatov Institute · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUSechenov University · RUMoscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RUResearch Centre for Medical Genetics · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Agreement No. 075-15-2021-1356 issued October 7, 2021 (15.CIN.21.0011, RF ID 0951.61321X0012)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports the electrospinning technique for the manufacturing of multilayered scaffolds for bile duct tissue engineering based on an inner layer of polycaprolactone (PCL) and an outer layer either of a copolymer of D,L-lactide and glycolide (PLGA) or a copolymer of L-lactide and ε-caprolactone (PLCL). A study of the degradation properties of separate polymers showed that flat PCL samples exhibited the highest resistance to hydrolysis in comparison with PLGA and PLCL. Irrespective of the liquid-phase nature, no significant mass loss of PCL samples was found in 140 days of incubation. The PLCL- and PLGA-based flat samples were more prone to hydrolysis within the same period of time, which was confirmed by the increased loss of mass and a significant reduction of weight-average molecular mass. The study of the mechanical properties of developed multi-layered tubular scaffolds revealed that their strength in the longitudinal and transverse directions was comparable with the values measured for a decellularized bile duct. The strength of three-layered scaffolds declined significantly because of the active degradation of the outer layer made of PLGA. The strength of scaffolds with the PLCL outer layer deteriorated much less with time, both in the axial (

Indexed as

bile ductbioactivebiobasedbiocompatibilitybiomedicalcopolymersdegradationdesignelectrospinningmulti-layeredmultilayeredphysiological relevancepolycaprolactonepolyestersregenerative medicinescaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36979723
PMCPMC10044742
OpenAlexW4322775123

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read26
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.