Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36980348›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Analysis of Efficacy-To-Safety Ratio of Angiogenesis-Inhibitors Based Therapies in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laurentiu Simion, Vlad Rotaru, Ciprian Cirimbei, Daniela-Cristina Stefan, Mirela Gherghe, Sinziana Ionescu, Bogdan Cosmin Tanase, Dan Cristian Luca, Laurentia Nicoleta Gales, Elena Chitoran

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detecting vascular normalization in epithelial ovarian cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurentiu SimionDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Vlad RotaruDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ciprian CirimbeiDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Daniela-Cristina StefanDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Mirela GhergheNuclear Medicine Department, Bucharest Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu", 022328 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-0428
Sinziana IonescuDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan Cosmin TanaseThoracic Surgery Department, Bucharest Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu", 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Dan Cristian LucaDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Laurentia Nicoleta GalesDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0414-1607
Elena ChitoranDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9225-8030
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul Oncologic Bucuresti · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Among new anti-angiogenesis agents being developed and ever-changing guidelines indications, the question of the benefits/safety ratio remains unclear. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review combined with a meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials (12,081 patients), evaluating overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity (grade ≥ 3 toxic effects, type, and number of all adverse effects. (3) Results: The analysis showed improvement of pooled-PFS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.78; I

Indexed as

angiogenesis inhibitorsFDA (Food and Drugs Administration) approval of cancer drugsmeta-analysisovarian canceroverall survivalprogression-free survivalrandomized controlled trialssystematic reviewtoxicityVEGF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36980348
PMCPMC10046967
OpenAlexW4323664934

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read94
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.