Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36981576›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Developmental Strategy and Validation of the Midwifery Interventions Classification (MIC): A Delphi Study Protocol and Results from the Developmental Phase.

Giulia Maga, Cristina Arrigoni, Lia Brigante, Rosaria Cappadona, Rosario Caruso, Marina Alice Sylvia Daniele, Elsa Del Bo, Chiara Ogliari, Arianna Magon

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulia MagaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Cristina ArrigoniDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Lia BriganteDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Rosaria CappadonaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-6209
Marina Alice Sylvia DanieleDepartment of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-9489
Elsa Del BoDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Chiara OgliariDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Arianna MagonHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0440-6940
University of Pavia · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITKing's College London · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study protocol aims to describe the rationale and developmental strategy of the first study in the Italian context which aimed to define a Midwifery Interventions Classification, an evidence-based, standardized taxonomy and classification of midwifery interventions. Midwifery interventions require a specific definition, developed through a consensus-building process by stakeholders to develop the Italian taxonomy of the Midwifery Interventions Classification with the potential for international transferability, implementation, and scaling up. A multi-round Delphi study was designed between June and September 2022, and data collection is planned between February 2023 and February 2024. The developmental phase of the study is based on a literature review to select meaningful midwifery interventions from the international literature, aiming to identify an evidence-based list of midwifery interventions. This phase led to including 16 articles derived from a systematic search performed on PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus; 164 midwifery interventions were selected from the data extraction performed on the 16 included articles. Healthcare professionals, researchers, and service users will be eligible panelists for the Delphi surveys. The protocol designed a dynamic number of consultation rounds based on the ratings and interim analysis. A nine-point Likert scoring system is designed to evaluate midwifery interventions. Attrition and attrition bias will be evaluated. The results from the study designed in this protocol will inform the development of the Italian taxonomy of the Midwifery Interventions Classification. A shared classification of midwifery interventions will support audit and quality improvement, education, and comparable data collections for research, sustaining public recognition of midwifery interventions to promote optimal maternal and newborn health.

Indexed as

delphimaternal and newborn healthmidwiferyprotocolquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID36981576
PMCPMC10048446
OpenAlexW4353062782

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.