Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36982095›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Does Physical Exercise Enhance the Immune Response after Vaccination? A Systematic Review for Clinical Indications of COVID-19 Vaccine.

Luca Barni, Elio Carrasco-Vega, Matteo Olivieri, Alejandro Galán-Mercant, Serena Guiducci, Felice Picariello, Manuel González-Sánchez

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The Immune System as a Biosensor of Health and Athletic Performance.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Vaccinomics and adversomics: key elements for a personalized vaccinology.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luca BarniDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-3481
Elio Carrasco-VegaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6820-6158
Matteo OlivieriIMT School for Advanced Studies, 55100 Lucca, Italy.
Alejandro Galán-MercantInstitute of Biomedicine of Cádiz (INIBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-0372
Serena GuiducciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Divisions of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology AOUC, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Felice PicarielloDepartment of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-7493
Manuel González-SánchezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-5092
Universidad de Málaga · ESIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · ITInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Cádiz · ESUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStimulating protective immunity with vaccines appears to be the most promising option for providing widespread moderate to high protection against COVID-19 in people over the age of 18. Regular exercise improves the immune response, transmitting possible benefits against virus infections. The aim of this review is to study the effects of physical activity on vaccine injections, helping to develop new recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.

methodsA comprehensive review of the existing literature was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The internal quality of the studies was assessed according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The outcomes analyzed were antibody titer, the level of lymphocytes CD4, CD8, InterLeukin 6 (IL6), leukocytes level, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for overall pain rating, arm and forearm circumferences and volume of oxygen (VO2) peak.

resultsFourteen articles were selected for the analysis. The majority of studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) (

conclusionsThe immune response (antibody titers) depends on age, gender and the intensity of physical activity: long-term protocols at moderate intensity are the most recommended. All of these aspects also have to be carefully considered for the COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultExerciseFemaleHumansImmunityMaleMiddle AgedPainVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinesimmune responsephysical exercisevaccination

Identifiers

PMID36982095
PMCPMC10049110
OpenAlexW4327620111

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read4
measurements read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.