Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983137›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Validation of an Automated Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for the Quantification of Major OCT Parameters in Diabetic Macular Edema.

Edoardo Midena, Lisa Toto, Luisa Frizziero, Giuseppe Covello, Tommaso Torresin, Giulia Midena, Luca Danieli, Elisabetta Pilotto, Michele Figus, Cesare Mariotti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Integrating TBSRTC subcategorization andFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Edoardo MidenaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Lisa TotoOphthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, University G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5311-5184
Luisa FrizzieroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1749-2737
Giuseppe CovelloDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-2032
Tommaso TorresinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-9350
Giulia MidenaIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4712-6631
Luca DanieliIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-0444
Elisabetta PilottoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-7697
Michele FigusDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-9033
Cesare MariottiEye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Marco LupidiEye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6817-2488
University of Padua · ITFondazione G.B. Bietti · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL)-based systems have gained wide interest in macular disorders, including diabetic macular edema (DME). This paper aims to validate an AI algorithm for identifying and quantifying different major optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers in DME eyes by comparing the algorithm to human expert manual examination. Intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) detection and volumes, external limiting-membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity, and hyperreflective retina foci (HRF) quantification were analyzed. Three-hundred three DME eyes were included. The mean central subfield thickness was 386.5 ± 130.2 µm. IRF was present in all eyes and confirmed by AI software. The agreement (kappa value) (95% confidence interval) for SRF presence and ELM and EZ interruption were 0.831 (0.738-0.924), 0.934 (0.886-0.982), and 0.936 (0.894-0.977), respectively. The accuracy of the automatic quantification of IRF, SRF, ELM, and EZ ranged between 94.7% and 95.7%, while accuracy of quality parameters ranged between 99.0% (OCT layer segmentation) and 100.0% (fovea centering). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between clinical and automated HRF count was excellent (0.97). This AI algorithm provides a reliable and reproducible assessment of the most relevant OCT biomarkers in DME. It may allow clinicians to routinely identify and quantify these parameters, offering an objective way of diagnosing and following DME eyes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkerdiabetic macular edemaellipsoid zoneexternal limiting membranehyperreflective retinal fociintraretinal fluidoutcomesspectral domain OCTsubretinal fluid

Identifiers

PMID36983137
PMCPMC10057946
OpenAlexW4323668241

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.