Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983213›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.

Sebastian Johannes Müller, Elina Henkes, Matthew J Gounis, Stephan Felber, Oliver Ganslandt, Hans Henkes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06367868 (Evaluation of the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Installed External Ventricular Drainage Catheter Due to Intracranial Pathology in the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06367868 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Installed External Ventricular Drainage Catheter Due to Intracranial Pathology in the Intensive Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled44ConditionsICP (Intracranial Pressure) Increase, Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter, Intracranial HypertensionArmsAfter 5 ml CSF Drainage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Fathoming the scientific paradox of intangibles: protocol reappraisal for optimizing cognitive outcomes in faciocraniosynostosis-an institutional experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Analysis of intracranial pressure waveform using a non-invasive method in individuals with craniosynostosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Is near-infrared spectroscopy a promising predictor for early intracranial hemorrhage diagnosis in the Emergency Department?Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian Johannes MüllerNeuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2147-9797
Elina HenkesNeuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
Matthew J GounisNew England Center for Stroke Research, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Stephan FelberInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Stiftungsklinikum Mittelrhein, D-56068 Koblenz, Germany.
Oliver GanslandtNeurochirurgische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
Hans HenkesNeuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-036X
Klinikum Stuttgart · DEGemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring plays a key role in the treatment of patients in intensive care units, as well as during long-term surgeries and interventions. The gold standard is invasive measurement and monitoring via ventricular drainage or a parenchymal probe. In recent decades, numerous methods for non-invasive measurement have been evaluated but none have become established in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to reflect on the current state of research and shed light on relevant techniques for future clinical application. (2) Methods: We performed a PubMed search for "non-invasive AND ICP AND (measurement OR monitoring)" and identified 306 results. On the basis of these search results, we conducted an in-depth source analysis to identify additional methods. Studies were analyzed for design, patient type (e.g., infants, adults, and shunt patients), statistical evaluation (correlation, accuracy, and reliability), number of included measurements, and statistical assessment of accuracy and reliability. (3) Results: MRI-ICP and two-depth Doppler showed the most potential (and were the most complex methods). Tympanic membrane temperature, diffuse correlation spectroscopy, natural resonance frequency, and retinal vein approaches were also promising. (4) Conclusions: To date, no convincing evidence supports the use of a particular method for non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement. However, many new approaches are under development.

Indexed as

intracranial hypertensionintracranial pressureneurointensive carenon-invasive ICP measurement

Identifiers

PMID36983213
PMCPMC10051320
OpenAlexW4324055438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.