A Qualitative Process Evaluation of Participant Experiences in a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial to Reduce Indulgent Foods and Beverages.

Claire Deborah Madigan, Andrew J Hill, Ian Douglas Caterson, Jessica Burk, Chelsea Hendy, Anna Chalkley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial

In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire Deborah MadiganThe Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.

Andrew J HillThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-0427

Ian Douglas CatersonThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6139-3632

Jessica BurkThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Chelsea HendyThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Anna ChalkleyCentre for Physically Active Learning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 6856 Sogndal, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1163-6210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the effects of ultra-processed/energy-dense nutrient-poor foods on health outcomes, and few interventions to reduce their consumption have been tested. We tested a simple intervention to help people reduce the indulgences they consume (energy-dense nutrient-poor (EDNP) foods). Herein, we report the qualitative findings to understand how participants reduced their consumption by exploring intervention fidelity and the factors affecting consumption. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of 23 adults who had taken part in a feasibility randomised controlled trial that asked participants to say no to seven indulgences/week and record what they said no to. Data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically. A total of 23 adults with an average BMI of 30.8 kg/m

Indexed as

BeveragesFoodAdultEatingFeasibility StudiesHumansNutrientsNutrientsenergy-dense nutrient-poor foodsobesityweight management

Identifiers

PMID36986119

DOI10.3390/nu15061389

PMCPMC10052994

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.