Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986788›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2023

Biopolymer- and Lipid-Based Carriers for the Delivery of Plant-Based Ingredients.

Lynda Gali, Annachiara Pirozzi, Francesco Donsì

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Prolonged Antimicrobial Effects ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Annatto (Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  15. Bioactive polysaccharides fromFood science & nutrition · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynda GaliBiotechnology Research Center-CRBt, Constantine 25016, Algeria.
Annachiara PirozziDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-8851
Francesco DonsìDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6433-4486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural ingredients are gaining increasing attention from manufacturers following consumers' concerns about the excessive use of synthetic ingredients. However, the use of natural extracts or molecules to achieve desirable qualities throughout the shelf life of foodstuff and, upon consumption, in the relevant biological environment is severely limited by their poor performance, especially with respect to solubility, stability against environmental conditions during product manufacturing, storage, and bioavailability upon consumption. Nanoencapsulation can be seen as an attractive approach with which to overcome these challenges. Among the different nanoencapsulation systems, lipids and biopolymer-based nanocarriers have emerged as the most effective ones because of their intrinsic low toxicity following their formulation with biocompatible and biodegradable materials. The present review aims to provide a survey of the recent advances in nanoscale carriers, formulated with biopolymers or lipids, for the encapsulation of natural compounds and plant extracts.

Indexed as

biopolymersencapsulationlipidsnanocarriersPickering emulsionsplant bioactive compounds

Identifiers

PMID36986788
PMCPMC10051097

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read30
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.