Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988309›Full record

ArticleACS nano2023

Unveiling the Mechanism of the

Shiling Dong, Barbara M Maciejewska, Maria Lißner, Daniel Thomson, David Townsend, Robert Millar, Nik Petrinic, Nicole Grobert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shiling DongDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Barbara M MaciejewskaDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Maria LißnerDepartment of Engineering, University of Oxford; Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, U.K.
Daniel ThomsonDepartment of Engineering, University of Oxford; Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, U.K.
David TownsendDepartment of Engineering, University of Oxford; Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, U.K.
Robert MillarWAE Technologies Ltd, Grove, Wantage, Oxfordshire OX12 0DQ, U.K.
Nik PetrinicDepartment of Engineering, University of Oxford; Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, U.K.
Nicole GrobertDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8499-8749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospinning technique is well-known for the generation of different fibers. While it is a "simple" technique, it lies in the fact that the fibers are typically produced in the form of densely packed two-dimensional (2D) mats with limited thickness, shape, and porosity. The highly demanded three-dimensional (3D) fiber assemblies have been explored by time-consuming postprocessing and/or complex setup modifications. Here, we use a classic electrospinning setup to directly produce 3D fiber macrostructures only by modulating the spinning solution. Increasing solution conductivity modifies electrodynamic jet behavior and fiber assembling process; both are observed

Indexed as

electrospinningfinite element analysisoil/water separationphase separationporous fibersol−gel synthesisthermal insulation

Identifiers

PMID36988309
PMCPMC10100559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.