ArticleJAMA network open2023
Association of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency With Outcomes in US Veterans With COVID-19.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A clinical algorithm to identify people with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase p.Val68Met variant at risk for diabetes undertreatment.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Clinical associations and potential cellular mechanisms linking G6PD deficiency and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.npj metabolic health and disease · 2025Review
- Article
- Longitudinal analysis of the lung proteome reveals persistent repair months after mild to moderate COVID-19.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Associations between COVID-19 and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity in Brazil.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- The global role of G6PD in infection and immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Coronavirus Disease 2019.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The underlying biological risk factors for severe outcome due to SAR-CoV-2 infection are not well defined. Objective: To determine the association between glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency and severity of COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included analysis of 24 700 veterans with G6PD enzyme testing prior to January 1, 2020, obtained through the US Veterans Health Administration national databases. These veterans were cross-referenced with the Veterans Administration COVID-19 Shared Data Resource for SARS-CoV-2 testing from February 15, 2020, to January 1, 2021. The final study population consisted of 4811 veterans who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Statistical analysis was performed from June to December 2021. Exposures: G6PD deficiency. Main Outcomes and Measures: COVID-19 severe illness, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: hospitalization, need for mechanical ventilation and/or intensive care unit admission, or in-hospital mortality after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Results: Among 4811 veterans in the Veterans Health Administration who had historical G6PD enzyme activity test results and SARS-CoV-2 positivity included in this study, 3868 (80.4%) were male, 1553 (32.3%) were Black, and 1855 (39%) were White; 1228 (25.5%) were 65 years or older and 3583 (74.5%) were younger than 65 years. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, or Charlson Comorbidity Index were present between the veterans with G6PD deficiency and without G6PD deficiency. Among these veterans with SARS-CoV-2 infection, G6PD deficiency was more prevalent in Black male veterans (309 of 454 [68.1%]) compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Black male veterans less than 65 years of age with G6PD deficiency had approximately 1.5-fold increased likelihood of developing severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with Black male veterans without G6PD deficiency (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.03-2.09). In the small subset of White male veterans with G6PD deficiency, we observed an approximately 3.6-fold increased likelihood of developing severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with White male veterans aged 65 years or older without G6PD deficiency (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.64-7.80). This difference between veterans with and without G6PD deficiency was not observed in younger White male veterans or older Black male veterans, nor in smaller subsets of other male veterans or in female veterans of any age. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of COVID-19-positive veterans, Black male veterans less than 65 years of age and White male veterans 65 years of age or older with G6PD deficiency had an increased likelihood of developing severe COVID-19 compared with veterans without G6PD deficiency. These data indicate a need to consider the potential for G6PD deficiency prior to treatment of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection as part of clinical strategies to mitigate severe outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.