Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36989328›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Bacterial communities of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes differ between crop and midgut tissues.

Luis E Martinez Villegas, James Radl, George Dimopoulos, Sarah M Short

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbial gatekeepers: midgut bacteria inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  19. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  20. Innate immunity inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luis E Martinez VillegasDepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
James RadlDepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
George DimopoulosDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Sarah M ShortDepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1074-8982

Funding

Zika and dengue virus agonists for transmission-blockingR21AI136456 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DIMOPOULOS, GEORGE · 2018 to 2019
$450k
The effect of the microbiota on male Aedes aegypti life history traitsR21AI174093 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHORT, SARAH M · 2023 to 2024
$433k
Analysis of molecular factors influencing variability of mosquito gut microbiotaF32AI112208 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHORT, SARAH M · 2015 to 2017
$173k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI112208NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI136456NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI174093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiota studies of Aedes aegypti and other mosquitoes generally focus on the bacterial communities found in adult female midguts. However, other compartments of the digestive tract maintain communities of bacteria which remain almost entirely unstudied. For example, the Dipteran crop is a food storage organ, but few studies have looked at the microbiome of crops in mosquitoes, and only a single previous study has investigated the crop in Ae. aegypti. In this study, we used both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods to compare the bacterial communities in midguts and crops of laboratory reared Ae. aegypti. Both methods revealed a trend towards higher abundance, but also higher variability, of bacteria in the midgut than the crop. When present, bacteria from the genus Elizabethkingia (family Weeksellaceae) dominated midgut bacterial communities. In crops, we found a higher diversity of bacteria, and these communities were generally dominated by acetic acid bacteria (family Acetobacteriaceae) from the genera Tanticharoenia and Asaia. These three taxa drove significant community structure differences between the tissues. We used FAPROTAX to predict the metabolic functions of these communities and found that crop bacterial communities were significantly more likely to contain bacteria capable of methanol oxidation and methylotrophy. Both the presence of acetic acid bacteria (which commonly catabolize sugar to produce acetic acid) and the functional profile that includes methanol oxidation (which is correlated with bacteria found with natural sources like nectar) may relate to the presence of sugar, which is stored in the mosquito crop. A better understanding of what bacteria are present in the digestive tract of mosquitoes and how these communities assemble will inform how the microbiota impacts mosquito physiology and the full spectrum of functions provided by the microbiota. It may also facilitate better methods of engineering the mosquito microbiome for vector control or prevention of disease transmission.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsBacteriaFemaleGastrointestinal TractMethanolMosquito VectorsSugarsMethanolSugars

Identifiers

PMID36989328
PMCPMC10085046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.