Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36989488›Full record

ArticleBlood2023

How I treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy.

Michael D Jain, Melody Smith, Nirali N Shah

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06072989 (A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of B4T2-001 CAR-T in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 171 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06072989 phase1recruitingnot on this map

A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of B4T2-001 CAR-T in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai East HospitalRan2023 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsAdvanced Solid TumorArmsB4T2-001 autologous CAR-T
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael D JainDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-1257
Melody SmithDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-0381
Nirali N ShahPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-9080

Funding

Immunotherapeutic approaches to treat pediatric hematologic malignanciesZIABC011823 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SHAH, NIRALI · 2019 to 2025
$6.1M
Investigating immunophenotype and metabolism of TCR KO donor and third-party CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cellsK08HL156082 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, MELODY · 2021 to 2025
$835k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011823NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL156082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is growing rapidly because of the expanding indications for standard-of-care treatment and the development of new investigational products. The establishment of consensus diagnostic criteria for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), alongside the steady use of both tocilizumab and corticosteroids for treatment, have been essential in facilitating the widespread use. Preemptive interventions to prevent more severe toxicities have improved safety, facilitating CAR T-cell therapy in medically frail populations and in those at high risk of severe CRS/ICANS. Nonetheless, the development of persistent or progressive CRS and ICANS remains problematic because it impairs patient outcomes and is challenging to treat. In this case-based discussion, we highlight a series of cases of CRS and/or ICANS refractory to front-line interventions. We discuss our approach to managing refractory toxicities that persist or progress beyond initial tocilizumab or corticosteroid administration, delineate risk factors for severe toxicities, highlight the emerging use of anakinra, and review mitigation strategies and supportive care measures to improve outcomes in patients who develop these refractory toxicities.

Indexed as

Cytokine Release SyndromeImmunotherapy, AdoptiveConsensusHumansInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinNeurotoxicity SyndromesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellcell-associated neurotoxicityInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID36989488
PMCPMC10329191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.