Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36990510›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2023

Genetic cold cases: lessons from solving complex congenital limb disorders.

Guillaume Andrey, Denis Duboule

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillaume AndreyDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland; denis.duboule@college-de-france.fr guillaume.andrey@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0911-4907
Denis DubouleCollège de France, 75231 Paris, France; denis.duboule@college-de-france.fr guillaume.andrey@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-2960
Collège de France · FRUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital genetic disorders affecting limb morphology in humans and other mammals are particularly well described, due to both their rather high frequencies of occurrence and the ease of their detection when expressed as severe forms. In most cases, their molecular and cellular etiology remained unknown long after their initial description, often for several decades, and sometimes close to a century. Over the past 20 yr, however, experimental and conceptual advances in our understanding of gene regulation, in particular over large genomic distances, have allowed these cold cases to be reopened and, eventually, for some of them to be solved. These investigations led not only to the isolation of the culprit genes and mechanisms, but also to the understanding of the often complex regulatory processes that are disturbed in such mutant genetic configurations. Here, we present several cases in which dormant regulatory mutations have been retrieved from the archives, starting from a historical perspective up to their molecular explanations. While some cases remain open, waiting for new tools and/or concepts to bring their investigations to an end, the solutions to others have contributed to our understanding of particular features often found in the regulation of developmental genes and hence can be used as benchmarks to address the impact of noncoding variants in the future.

Indexed as

GenomeMammalsAnimalsHumansMutationchromatincongenital disorderenhancerslimb developmentmutations

Identifiers

PMID36990510
PMCPMC10153463
OpenAlexW4361296606

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.