Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36993149›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Effect of MHC and inbreeding on disassortative reproduction: A data revisit, extension and inclusion of fertilization in sand lizards.

Badreddine Bererhi, Pierre Duchesne, Tonia S Schwartz, Beata Ujvari, Erik Wapstra, Mats Olsson

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Badreddine BererhiDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-3194
Pierre DuchesneDepartment of Biology Laval University Quebec Québec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-8204
Tonia S SchwartzDepartment of Biological Sciences Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7712-2810
Beata UjvariSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-2988
Erik WapstraSchool of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-8026
Mats OlssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-1323
Auburn University · USDeakin University · AUUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The harmful effects of close inbreeding have been recognized for centuries and, with the rise of Mendelian genetics, was realized to be an effect of homozygosis. This historical background led to great interest in ways to quantify inbreeding, its depression effects on the phenotype and flow-on effects on mate choice and other aspects of behavioral ecology. The mechanisms and cues used to avoid inbreeding are varied and include major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and the peptides they transport as predictors of the degree of genetic relatedness. Here, we revisit and complement data from a Swedish population of sand lizards (

Indexed as

assortative matingLacerta agilismajor histocompatibility complex (MHC)microsatellite‐screened inbreedingpre‐copulatory biased paternity

Identifiers

PMID36993149
PMCPMC10041550
OpenAlexW4361012353

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.