Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995577›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2023

Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Eating Disorders: A Roadmap to Inform Future Research Efforts.

Sasha Gorrell, Lisa Hail, Erin E Reilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sasha GorrellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 675 18Th St, CA, 94143, San Francisco, USA. Sasha.Gorrell@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-8547
Lisa HailDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 675 18Th St, CA, 94143, San Francisco, USA.
Erin E ReillyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 675 18Th St, CA, 94143, San Francisco, USA.

Funding

Using Computational Modeling to Test Reinforcement Learning as a Predictor of Response in Family-Based Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia NervosaK23MH131871 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Erin E. Reilly · 2022 to 2026
$982k
Neural Correlates of Reinforcement Learning Specific to Hyperactivityin Adolescent Anorexia NervosaK23MH126201 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GORRELL, SASHA CATHERINE · 2021 to 2025
$848k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH126201NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH131871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWith the current review, we provide a brief summary of recent literature that tests clinically observable characteristics at baseline that may impact treatment response, across eating disorder diagnoses. We then provide a critical discussion regarding how researchers may shift their approach to this research to improve treatment implications and generalizability of these findings. RECENT

findingsRecent work has broadly replicated prior findings suggesting a negative impact of lower weight status, poor emotion regulation, and early-life trauma on eating disorder treatment outcomes. Findings are more mixed for the relative contributions of illness duration, psychiatric comorbidity, and baseline symptom severity. Recent studies have begun to explore more specific domains of previously tested predictors (e.g., specific comorbidities) as well as previously neglected identity-related and systemic factors. However, recent research continues to use similar sampling techniques and approaches to analysis used in prior work. We propose that resolving remaining questions and illuminating predictors of treatment outcome in eating disorders requires a new approach to research sampling and study design. Suggested changes that can be applied within a traditional clinical trial framework may yield new insights with relevance across transdiagnostic eating disorder presentations.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBinge-Eating DisorderBulimia NervosaFeeding and Eating DisordersComorbidityHumansTreatment OutcomeAnorexia nervosaBinge eating disorderBulimia nervosaTreatment outcomesTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID36995577
PMCPMC10360436

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.