Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995672›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Electroporation-Mediated CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Rat Zygotes.

Daniel J Davis, Hongsheng Men, Elizabeth C Bryda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CRISPR-Cas9 in the Tailoring of Genetically Engineered Animals.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J DavisAnimal Modeling Core, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. davisdaniel@missouri.edu.
Hongsheng MenRat Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Elizabeth C BrydaAnimal Modeling Core, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic engineering in the rat has been revolutionized by the development of CRISPR-based genome editing tools. Conventional methods for inserting genome editing elements such as CRISPR/Cas9 reagents into rat zygotes include cytoplasmic or pronuclear microinjections. These techniques are labor-intensive, require specialized micromanipulator equipment, and are technically challenging. Here, we describe a simple and effective method for zygote electroporation in which CRISPR/Cas9 reagents are introduced into rat zygotes via pores produced by precise electrical pulses applied to the cells. Zygote electroporation allows for high-throughput efficient genome editing in rat embryos.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsElectroporationElectroporation TherapiesRatsZygoteCRISPR/Cas9ElectroporationEmbryoGenome editingRatZygote

Identifiers

PMID36995672
OpenAlexW4361302974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.