Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997021›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2023

Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Multimodal In Situ Vaccination Using Cryoablation and a Plant Virus Immunostimulant.

Mansur A Ghani, Amandip Bangar, Yunpeng Yang, Eunkyeong Jung, Consuelo Sauceda, Tyler Mandt, Sourabh Shukla, Nicholas J G Webster, Nicole F Steinmetz, Isabel G Newton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plant-Derived Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Biopharmaceuticals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mansur A GhaniDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Amandip BangarDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Yunpeng YangDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Eunkyeong JungDepartment of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Consuelo SaucedaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Tyler MandtDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Sourabh ShuklaDepartment of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Nicholas J G WebsterDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Nicole F SteinmetzDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of NanoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Center for Nano-ImmunoEngineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Institute for Materials Discovery and Design, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Isabel G NewtonDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California. Electronic address: inewton@health.ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USUC San Diego Health System · US

Funding

Dual-pronged nano-drug delivery using plant virus-like particles.R01CA224605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Nicole Franziska Steinmetz · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Traning Clinical Scientists in Radiological ImagingT32EB005970 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Eric Y Chang, Rebecca Ann Rakow-Penner · 2007 to 2026
$3.2M
Overcoming the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment through in situ vaccination nanotechnology.U01CA218292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIERING, STEVEN, STEINMETZ, NICOLE FRANZISKA · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
SRSF3 degradation in liver disease and hepatocellular carcinomaI01BX004848 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI WEBSTER, NICHOLAS J · 2020 to 2025
–
BLR&D Research Career Scientist Award ApplicationIK6BX005224 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI WEBSTER, NICHOLAS J · 2020 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004848BLRD VA IK6 BX005224NCI NIH HHS R01 CA224605NCI NIH HHS U01 CA218292NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB005970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test the hypothesis that cryoablation combined with intratumoral immunomodulating nanoparticles from cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) as an in situ vaccination approach induces systemic antitumoral immunity in a murine model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND

methodsMice with bilateral, subcutaneous RIL-175 cell-derived HCCs were randomized to 4 groups: (a) phosphate-buffered saline (control), (b) cryoablation only (Cryo), (c) CPMV-treated only (CPMV), and (d) cryoablation plus CPMV-treated (Cryo + CPMV) (N = 11-14 per group). Intratumoral CPMV was administered every 3 days for 4 doses, with cryoablation performed on the third day. Contralateral tumors were monitored. Tumor growth and systemic chemokine/cytokine levels were measured. A subset of tumors and spleens were harvested for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry. One- or 2-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical comparisons. A P value of <.05 was used as the threshold for statistical significance.

resultsAt 2 weeks after treatment, the Cryo and CPMV groups, alone or combined, outperformed the control group in the treated tumor; however, the Cryo + CPMV group showed the strongest reduction and lowest variance (1.6-fold ± 0.9 vs 6.3-fold ± 0.5, P < .0001). For the untreated tumor, only Cryo + CPMV significantly reduced tumor growth compared with control (9.2-fold ± 0.9 vs 17.8-fold ± 2.1, P = .01). The Cryo + CPMV group exhibited a transient increase in interleukin-10 and persistently decreased CXCL1. Flow cytometry revealed natural killer cell enrichment in the untreated tumor and increased PD-1 expression in the spleen. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes increased in Cryo + CPMV-treated tumors by IHC.

conclusionsCryoablation and intratumoral CPMV, alone or combined, demonstrated potent efficacy against treated HCC tumors; however, only cryoablation combined with CPMV slowed the growth of untreated tumors, consistent with an abscopal effect.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularComovirusCryosurgeryLiver NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsMiceVaccinationAdjuvants, Immunologic

Identifiers

PMID36997021
PMCPMC10829876
OpenAlexW4361225299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.