Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37000299›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2023

ASLncR: a novel computational tool for prediction of abiotic stress-responsive long non-coding RNAs in plants.

Upendra Kumar Pradhan, Prabina Kumar Meher, Sanchita Naha, Atmakuri Ramakrishna Rao, Ajit Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Upendra Kumar PradhanDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Prabina Kumar MeherDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi, 110012, India. meherprabin@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7098-8785
Sanchita NahaDivision of Computer Applications, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Atmakuri Ramakrishna RaoIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India.
Ajit GuptaDivision of Statistical Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, PUSA, New Delhi, 110012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stresses are detrimental to plant growth and development and have a major negative impact on crop yields. A growing body of evidence indicates that a large number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are key to many abiotic stress responses. Thus, identifying abiotic stress-responsive lncRNAs is essential in crop breeding programs in order to develop crop cultivars resistant to abiotic stresses. In this study, we have developed the first machine learning-based computational model for predicting abiotic stress-responsive lncRNAs. The lncRNA sequences which were responsive and non-responsive to abiotic stresses served as the two classes of the dataset for binary classification using the machine learning algorithms. The training dataset was created using 263 stress-responsive and 263 non-stress-responsive sequences, whereas the independent test set consists of 101 sequences from both classes. As the machine learning model can adopt only the numeric data, the Kmer features ranging from sizes 1 to 6 were utilized to represent lncRNAs in numeric form. To select important features, four different feature selection strategies were utilized. Among the seven learning algorithms, the support vector machine (SVM) achieved the highest cross-validation accuracy with the selected feature sets. The observed 5-fold cross-validation accuracy, AU-ROC, and AU-PRC were found to be 68.84, 72.78, and 75.86%, respectively. Furthermore, the robustness of the developed model (SVM with the selected feature) was evaluated using an independent test dataset, where the overall accuracy, AU-ROC, and AU-PRC were found to be 76.23, 87.71, and 88.49%, respectively. The developed computational approach was also implemented in an online prediction tool ASLncR accessible at https://iasri-sg.icar.gov.in/aslncr/ . The proposed computational model and the developed prediction tool are believed to supplement the existing effort for the identification of abiotic stress-responsive lncRNAs in plants.

Indexed as

RNA, Long NoncodingAlgorithmsComputational BiologyPlant BreedingPlantsStress, PhysiologicalRNA, Long NoncodingAbiotic stressComputational biologyLong non-coding RNAMachine learning

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.