Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37008807›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2023

What motivates adults to accept influenza vaccine? An assessment of incentives, ease of access, messaging, and sources of information using a discrete choice experiment.

Kimberly E Bonner, Sandra Chyderiotis, Jonathan Sicsic, Judith E Mueller, Angela K Ulrich, Traci Toomey, Keith J Horvath, James D Neaton, Nicole E Basta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kimberly E BonnerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sandra ChyderiotisDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jonathan SicsicUniversité Paris Cité, LIRAES F-75006, F-75006, Paris, France.
Judith E MuellerEHESP French School of Public Health, La Plaine St Denis, France; Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Angela K UlrichCenter for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Traci ToomeyDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Keith J HorvathDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, USA.
James D NeatonDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicole E BastaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
University of Minnesota · USMcGill University · CAInstitut Pasteur · FRSan Diego State University · USUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Quantifying the Breadth and Duration of Immunity Induced by Meningococcal B VaccinesR01AI132496 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BASTA, NICOLE ELAINE · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal influenza vaccination rates remain low, and contribute to preventable influenza cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in the US. While numerous interventions have been implemented to increase vaccine uptake, there is a need to determine which interventions contribute most to vaccine willingness, particularly among age groups with vaccination rates that have plateaued at suboptimal levels. This study aimed to quantify the relative effect of multiple interventions on vaccine willingness to receive influenza vaccine in three age groups using a series of hypothetical situations with different behavioral interventions. We assessed the relative impact of four categories of interventions: source of vaccine messages, type of vaccination messages, vaccination incentives, and ease of vaccine access using a discrete choice experiment. Within each category, we investigated the role of four different attributes to measure their relative contribution to willingness to be vaccinated by removing one option from each of the intervention categories. Among the 1,763 Minnesota residents who volunteered for our study, participants expressed vaccine willingness in over 80% of the scenarios presented. Easy access to drop-in vaccination sites had the greatest impact on vaccine willingness in all age groups. Among the younger age group, small financial incentives also contributed to high vaccine willingness. Our results suggest that public health programs and vaccination campaigns may improve their chances of successfully increasing vaccine willingness if they offer interventions preferred by adults, including facilitating convenient access to vaccination and offering small monetary incentives, particularly for young adults.

Indexed as

AdultsDiscrete choice experimentInfluenza vaccineVaccine confidenceVaccine demand

Identifiers

PMID37008807
PMCPMC10060740
OpenAlexW4324144295

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.