Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37011041›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2023

Engaging diverse midlife and older adults in a multilevel participatory physical activity intervention: evaluating impacts using Ripple Effects Mapping.

Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa, Abby C King, Isela Blanco-Velazquez, Ann W Banchoff, Maria Ines Campero, Wei-Ting Chen, Lisa G Rosas

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ripple Effects Mapping: Evaluating Multilevel Perspectives and Impacts of a Statewide Community-Academic Partnership Network on Covid-19 Health Disparities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia Rodriguez EspinosaDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7578-305X
Abby C KingDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-8811
Isela Blanco-VelazquezDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.
Ann W BanchoffDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.
Maria Ines CamperoDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.
Wei-Ting ChenOffice of Community Engagement, Stanford School of Medicine, USA.
Lisa G RosasDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Citizen Science to Promote Sustained Physical Activity in Low-Income CommunitiesR01CA211048 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KING, ABBY C · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211048NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilevel interventions are increasingly recommended to increase physical activity (PA) but can present evaluation challenges. Participatory qualitative evaluation methods can complement standard quantitative methods by identifying participant-centered outcomes and potential mechanisms of individual and community-level change. We assessed the feasibility and utility of Ripple Effects Mapping (REM), a novel qualitative method, within the context of a multi-level cluster randomized trial, Steps for Change. Housing sites with ethnically diverse, low-income aging adults were randomized to a PA behavioral intervention alone or in combination with a citizen science-based intervention (Our Voice) for promoting PA-supportive neighborhoods. Four REM sessions were conducted after 12 months of intervention and involved six housing sites (n = 35 participants) stratified by intervention arm. Interviews (n = 5) were also conducted with housing site staff. Sessions leaders engaged participants in visually mapping intended and unintended outcomes of intervention participation and participant-driven solutions to reported challenges. Maps were analyzed using Excel and Xmind 8 Pro and data were classified according to the socio-ecological model. Eight themes were identified for outcomes, challenges, and solutions. Most themes (6/8) were similar across intervention arms, including increasing PA and PA tracking, improving health outcomes, and increasing social connectedness. Groups (n = 2) engaged in Our Voice additionally identified increased community knowledge and activities directly impacting local environmental change (e.g., pedestrian infrastructure changes). Housing staff interviews revealed additional information to enhance future intervention recruitment, sustainability, and implementation. Such qualitative methodologies can aid in evaluating multi-level, multi-component interventions and inform future intervention optimization, implementation, and dissemination.

Indexed as

ExercisePovertyAgedAgingHumansCitizen scienceLifestyle behavioral interventionsParticipatory methodsPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID37011041
PMCPMC10496429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.