Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37013496›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2023

The ADEM2 project: early pathogenic mechanisms of preschool wheeze and a randomised controlled trial assessing the gain in health and cost-effectiveness by application of the breath test for the diagnosis of asthma in wheezing preschool children.

Sophie Kienhorst, Moniek H D van Aarle, Quirijn Jöbsis, Michiel A G E Bannier, Elin T G Kersten, Jan Damoiseaux, Onno C P van Schayck, Peter J F M Merkus, Gerard H Koppelman, Frederik-Jan van Schooten and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie KienhorstDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. sophie.kienhorst@mumc.nl.
Moniek H D van AarleDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Quirijn JöbsisDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Michiel A G E BannierDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elin T G KerstenDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, and GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan DamoiseauxCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Onno C P van SchayckDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter J F M MerkusDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerard H KoppelmanDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, and GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frederik-Jan van SchootenDepartment Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
ADEM2 Consortium
Agnieszka SmolinskaDepartment Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Edward DompelingDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of asthma-like symptoms in preschool children is high. Despite numerous efforts, there still is no clinically available diagnostic tool to discriminate asthmatic children from children with transient wheeze at preschool age. This leads to potential overtreatment of children outgrowing their symptoms, and to potential undertreatment of children who turn out to have asthma. Our research group developed a breath test (using GC-tof-MS for VOC-analysis in exhaled breath) that is able to predict a diagnosis of asthma at preschool age. The ADEM2 study assesses the improvement in health gain and costs of care with the application of this breath test in wheezing preschool children.

methodsThis study is a combination of a multi-centre, parallel group, two arm, randomised controlled trial and a multi-centre longitudinal observational cohort study. The preschool children randomised into the treatment arm of the RCT receive a probability diagnosis (and corresponding treatment recommendations) of either asthma or transient wheeze based on the exhaled breath test. Children in the usual care arm do not receive a probability diagnosis. Participants are longitudinally followed up until the age of 6 years. The primary outcome is disease control after 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Participants of the RCT, together with a group of healthy preschool children, also contribute to the parallel observational cohort study developed to assess the validity of alternative VOC-sensing techniques and to explore numerous other potential discriminating biological parameters (such as allergic sensitisation, immunological markers, epigenetics, transcriptomics, microbiomics) and the subsequent identification of underlying disease pathways and relation to the discriminative VOCs in exhaled breath. DISCUSSION: The potential societal and clinical impact of the diagnostic tool for wheezing preschool children is substantial. By means of the breath test, it will become possible to deliver customized and high qualitative care to the large group of vulnerable preschool children with asthma-like symptoms. By applying a multi-omics approach to an extensive set of biological parameters we aim to explore (new) pathogenic mechanisms in the early development of asthma, creating potentially interesting targets for the development of new therapies.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register, NL7336, Date registered 11-10-2018.

Indexed as

AsthmaVolatile Organic CompoundsBreath TestsChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansRespiratory SoundsVolatile Organic CompoundsAsthmaBiomarkersBreath testDiagnosisExhaled VOCPathogenesisPreschoolWheeze

Identifiers

PMID37013496
PMCPMC10068201
OpenAlexW4362522124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.