ArticleAging2023
Bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation of a novel autophagy-related signature relevant to immune infiltration for recurrence prediction after curative hepatectomy.
Article in Aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- TRIM22 mechanism promoting KAT2A ubiquitination degradation to regulate ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis.Histology and histopathology · 2025Article
- Anthocyanin-Mediated Autophagy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Gene Associations and Prognostic Implications.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- SNRPE is Associated with ERK/mTOR Signaling Activation and Reduced Autophagy to Promote Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation.OncoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- Emerging Prognostic Markers in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Construction and validation of a folate metabolism-related gene signature for predicting prognosis in HNSCC.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains imposing an enormous economic and healthcare burden worldwide. In this present study, we constructed and validated a novel autophagy-related gene signature to predict the recurrence of HCC patients. A total of 29 autophagy-related differentially expressed genes were identified. A five-gene signature (CLN3, HGF, TRIM22, SNRPD1, and SNRPE) was constructed for HCC recurrence prediction. Patients in high-risk groups exhibited a significantly poor prognosis compared with low-risk patients both in the training set (GSE14520 dataset) and the validation set (TCGA and GSE76427 dataset). Multivariate cox regression analysis demonstrated that the 5-gene signature was an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in HCC patients. The nomograms incorporating 5-gene signature and clinical prognostic risk factors were able to effectively predict RFS. KEGG and GSEA analysis revealed that the high-risk group was enriched with multiple oncology characteristics and invasive-related pathways. Besides, the high-risk group had a higher level of immune cells and higher levels of immune checkpoint-related gene expression in the tumor microenvironment, suggesting that they might be more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Finally, the immunohistochemistry and cell experiments confirmed the role of SNRPE, the most significant gene in the gene signature. SNRPE was significantly overexpressed in HCC. After SNRPE knockdown, the proliferation, migration and invasion ability of the HepG2 cell line were significantly inhibited. Our study established a novel five-gene signature and nomogram to predict RFS of HCC, which may help in clinical decision-making for individual treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.