Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014672›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Criteria for Advanced Prosthetic Foot Prescription: Rationale, Design, and Protocol for a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jason T Maikos, Brad D Hendershot, Alison L Pruziner, Michael J Hyre, John M Chomack, Samuel L Phillips, Jeffrey T Heckman, Alexis N Sidiropoulos, Christopher L Dearth, Leif M Nelson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03505983 (Criteria for Advanced Prosthetic Foot Prescription), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03505983 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Criteria for Advanced Prosthetic Foot Prescription

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA New York Harbor Healthcare SystemRan2018 to 2026Enrolled91ConditionsProsthesis User, Amputation, Traumatic, Limb, LowerArmsESR Prosthetic Foot First, Articulating ESR Prosthetic Foot First, Powered Prosthetic Foot First
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jason T Maikos *Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-7517
Brad D Hendershot *Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-9551
Alison L Pruziner *Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-2523
Michael J Hyre *The Narrows Institute for Biomedical Research and Education, Inc, Brooklyn, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-6589
John M Chomack *The Narrows Institute for Biomedical Research and Education, Inc, Brooklyn, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8150-1533
Samuel L Phillips *James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-8021
Jeffrey T Heckman *Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9695-5589
Alexis N Sidiropoulos *Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-4151
Christopher L Dearth *Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-0950
Leif M Nelson *Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9678-7068
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USVA NY Harbor Healthcare System · USJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot devices is often based on the professional judgment of the limb loss care team or limited evidentiary research. Current prosthetic research efforts have focused on the design and development of prosthetic devices rather than on understanding which devices are the most appropriate to prescribe. This investigation will evaluate biomechanical, functional, and subjective outcome measures to help determine the optimal prescription parameters of prosthetic ankle-foot devices.

objectiveThis study aims to develop evidence-based guidelines for limb loss care teams for the appropriate prescription of commercially available prosthetic ankle-foot devices to improve function and satisfaction.

methodsThis investigation will be a multisite, randomized, crossover clinical trial targeting the enrollment of 100 participants. Participants will use 3 different types of prosthetic devices (energy storing and returning, articulating, and powered) in random order. Participants will be fitted and trained with each device and then separately use each device for a 1-week acclimation period. Following each 1-week acclimation period, participants will be evaluated using several functional measures and subjective surveys. A random subset of participants (30/100, 30%) will also undergo full-body gait analysis, following each 1-week acclimation period, to collect biomechanical data during level ground and incline and decline walking. After all individual device evaluations, participants will be given all 3 prostheses concurrently for 4 weeks of home and community use to capture user preference. Activity monitoring and a guided interview will be used to determine overall user preference.

resultsThe study was funded in August 2017, and data collection began in 2018. Data collection is expected to be completed before July 2023. Initial dissemination of results is expected to occur in the winter of 2023.

conclusionsBy identifying biomechanical, functional, and subjective outcomes that are sensitive to differences in prosthetic ankle-foot devices, a benchmark of evidence can be developed to guide effective prosthetic prescription.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03505983; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03505983. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45612.

Indexed as

amputationlimb losslower extremityprosthetic ankle-foot devicesprosthetic prescription

Identifiers

PMID37014672
PMCPMC10131701
OpenAlexW4362521778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.