ArticlePediatric obesity2023
Paediatric obesity: Documentation, screening, and pharmacotherapy in a national cohort.
Article in Pediatric obesity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Predictors of Guideline Concordant Pediatric Obesity Care: A Narrative Review.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Targeting CD44-Hyaluronic Acid Signalling in Obesity Treatment: Insights from Small Molecules and Nanobioconjugates.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2026Review
- Real -world experience with anti-obesity medications treatment in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity in Israel.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Observational
- Recorded diagnosis of overweight/obesity in primary care is linked to obesity care performance rates.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Increasing Screening Rates for Comorbidities in Adolescents with Elevated Body Mass Index in Pediatric Primary Care.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple organizations have published guidelines for the screening and treatment of obesity and related comorbidities in youth, including the use of anti-obesity medications (AOM). This study aimed to determine which paediatric patients: (1) receive a diagnostic code for obesity; (2) are most likely to be screened for hyperlipidaemia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus; and (3) are most likely to be prescribed AOM.
methodsA cohort of 35 898 patients 9 years 4 months to 17 years 6 months of age with a BMI > 30 or greater than the 95th% on three separate outpatient encounters was generated using the TriNetX database. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between demographics in the study population and the likelihood of diagnosis of obesity, screening for comorbidities, and prescription of AOMs.
resultsAsian, Black, and Hispanic youths had increased odds of having a diagnosis of obesity and being screened for all three comorbidities. Documentation of obesity was associated with increased odds of screening for all comorbidities. Female sex, documentation of obesity, and higher BMIs were associated with increased odds of being prescribed AOMs. Black and Native American races decreased the likelihood of being prescribed AOM.
conclusionsManagement of obesity in terms of documentation of disease, screening for comorbidities, and initiation of AOM continues to fall short of the guidelines put forth by multiple organizations. Race/ethnicity, sex, and BMI correlate with differences in care provided to obese paediatric patients. Further research is needed to identify the barriers to and causes of these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.