Evidence mapPaperPMID 37019884Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2023

Using naltrexone to validate a human laboratory test system to screen new medications for alcoholism (TESMA)- a randomized clinical trial.

Maik Spreer, Xina Grählert, Ina-Maria Klut, Feras Al Hamdan, Wolfgang H Sommer, Martin H Plawecki, Sean O'Connor, Michael Böttcher, Cathrin Sauer, Michael N Smolka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maik SpreerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. maik.spreer@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8436-8520
Xina GrählertCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ina-Maria KlutHospital-Pharmacy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Feras Al HamdanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Wolfgang H SommerInstitute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5903-6521
Martin H PlaweckiDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sean O'ConnorDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michael BöttcherDepartment of Toxicology, MVZ Medizinische Labore Dessau Kassel GmbH, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
Cathrin SauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael N SmolkaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-5569
Ulrich S ZimmermannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7900-4992
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEIndiana University School of MedicineHeidelberg University · DEIsar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DEStädtisches Klinikum Dessau · DE

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAVID A. KAREKEN · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
Sex Differences in the Response to Abstinence from Alcohol.R01AA027236 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CYDERS, MELISSA A, PLAWECKI, MARTIN H. · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This registered clinical trial sought to validate a laboratory test system devised to screen medications for alcoholism treatment (TESMA) under different contingencies of alcohol reinforcement. Forty-six nondependent, but at least medium-risk drinkers were given the opportunity to earn intravenous infusions of ethanol, or saline, as rewards for work in a progressive-ratio paradigm. Work demand pattern and alcohol exposure dynamics were devised to achieve a gradual shift from low-demand work for alcohol (WFA) permitting quickly increasing breath alcohol concentrations (BrAC) to high-demand WFA, which could only decelerate an inevitable decrease of the previously earned BrAC. Thereby, the reward contingency changed, modeling different drinking motivations. The experiment was repeated after at least 7 days of randomized, double-blinded treatment with naltrexone, escalated to 50 mg/d, or placebo. Subjects treated with naltrexone reduced their cumulative WFA (cWFA) slightly more than participants receiving placebo. This difference was not statistically significant in the preplanned analysis of the entire 150 min of self-administration, i.e., our primary endpoint (p = 0.471, Cohen's d = 0.215). Naltrexone serum levels correlated with change in cWFA (r = -0.53; p = 0.014). Separate exploratory analyses revealed that naltrexone significantly reduced WFA during the first, but not the second half of the experiment (Cohen's d = 0.643 and 0.14, respectively). Phase-dependent associations of WFA with changes in subjective stimulation, wellbeing and desire for alcohol suggested that the predominant reinforcement of WFA was positive during the first phase only, and might have been negative during the second. We conclude that the TESMA is a safe and practical method. It bears the potential to quickly and efficiently screen new drugs for their efficacy to attenuate positively reinforced alcohol consumption. It possibly also provides a condition of negative reinforcement, and for the first time provides experimental evidence suggesting that naltrexone's effect might depend on reward contingency.

Indexed as

AlcoholismNaltrexoneAlcohol DrinkingEthanolHumansNarcotic AntagonistsEthanolNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID37019884
PMCPMC10076427
OpenAlexW4362610325

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.