Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37020120›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2023

Proteome alterations in human autopsy tissues in relation to time after death.

Éva Kocsmár, Marlene Schmid, Miguel Cosenza-Contreras, Ildikó Kocsmár, Melanie Föll, Leah Krey, Bálint András Barta, Gergely Rácz, András Kiss, Martin Werner and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. "Omics" and Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Éva Kocsmár *Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-1323
Marlene Schmid *Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Miguel Cosenza-ContrerasInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Ildikó KocsmárDepartment of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Melanie FöllInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Leah KreyInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Bálint András BartaInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Gergely RáczDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
András KissDepartment of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Martin WernerInstitute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Oliver Schilling *Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. oliver.schilling@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7678-7653
Gábor Lotz *Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-8978
Peter Bronsert *Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. peter.bronsert@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University of Freiburg · DESemmelweis University · HUNortheastern University · US

Funding

EU- and European Social Fund EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary) K_18 128881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein expression is a primary area of interest for routine histological diagnostics and tissue-based research projects, but the limitations of its post-mortem applicability remain largely unclear. On the other hand, tissue specimens obtained during autopsies can provide unique insight into advanced disease states, especially in cancer research. Therefore, we aimed to identify the maximum post-mortem interval (PMI) which is still suitable for characterizing protein expression patterns, to explore organ-specific differences in protein degradation, and to investigate whether certain proteins follow specific degradation kinetics. Therefore, the proteome of human tissue samples obtained during routine autopsies of deceased patients with accurate PMI (6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72, 96 h) and without specific diseases that significantly affect tissue preservation, from lungs, kidneys and livers, was analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). For the kidney and liver, significant protein degradation became apparent at 48 h. For the lung, the proteome composition was rather static for up to 48 h and substantial protein degradation was detected only at 72 h suggesting that degradation kinetics appear to be organ specific. More detailed analyses suggested that proteins with similar post-mortem kinetics are not primarily shared in their biological functions. The overrepresentation of protein families with analogous structural motifs in the kidney indicates that structural features may be a common factor in determining similar postmortem stability. Our study demonstrates that a longer post-mortem period may have a significant impact on proteome composition, but sampling within 24 h may be appropriate, as degradation is within acceptable limits even in organs with faster autolysis.

Indexed as

Postmortem ChangesProteomeAutopsyChromatography, LiquidHumansTandem Mass SpectrometryProteomeAutopsyDegradationProteomics

Identifiers

PMID37020120
PMCPMC10075177
OpenAlexW4362636787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.